Saahdi Coleman v. Figueroa et al
Filing
18
ORDER DISREGARDING 16 Plaintiff's Request for Administrative Remedies to be Deemeed Exhausted signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 8/31/2015. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
SAAHDI COLEMAN,
11
Plaintiff,
v.
12
13
FIGUEROA, et al.,
14
Case No. 1:15-cv-00109 AWI DLB (PC)
ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE
REMEDIES TO BE DEEMED EXHAUSTED
(Document 16)
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
15
16
Plaintiff Saahdi Coleman (“Plaintiff”), a state inmate in the custody of the California
17 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this
18 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant
19
On June 25, 2015, the Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. Plaintiff’s
20 amended complaint is due on or about September 2, 2015.
21
On August 28, 2015, Plaintiff filed a “Request for Administrative Remedies Required by
22 PLRA to be Deemed Exhausted.” Plaintiff appears to be asking the Court to make a finding that
23 he has exhausted his claims.
24
The failure to exhaust administrative remedies is an affirmative defense, meaning that the
25 Court will not make a determination as to whether Plaintiff exhausted unless and until a defendant
26 raises the issue. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s request is DISREGARDED.
27 ///
28 ///
1
The Court also notes that Plaintiff filed a Request for Judicial Notice on August 28, 2015,
2 in which he asks that the Court take judicial notice of exhibits for his amended complaint.
3 However, Plaintiff has not yet filed an amended complaint. Plaintiff is advised that exhibits, if
4 any, should be attached to his amended complaint.
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
August 31, 2015
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?