Carlos Hernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 48

ORDER ADOPTING 46 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; Plaintiff's appeal is GRANTED IN PART; this matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order and the directives outlined in the adopted findings and recommendations, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/28/17. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CARLOS HERNANDEZ, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 1:15-cv-00110-DAD-GSA Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND REMANDING THIS ACTION (Doc. No. 46) Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Carlos Hernandez seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner 19 of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his application for disability insurance benefits and 20 supplemental security income. (Doc. No. 1.) 21 On July 20, 2017, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 22 recommending that plaintiff’s appeal from the administrative decision be granted in part and that 23 this action be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the analysis 24 set forth therein. (Doc. No. 46.) The findings and recommendations were served on the parties 25 and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within thirty days. (Id.) The 26 time for filing such objections has passed, and no objections have been filed. 27 28 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(c), this court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds that the 1 1 findings and recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. 2 Accordingly, 3 1. The July 20, 2017 findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 46), are adopted in full; 4 2. Plaintiff’s appeal is granted in part; and 5 3. This matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order and the 6 7 8 directives outlined in the adopted findings and recommendations. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 28, 2017 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?