Carlin v. Allenby et al

Filing 13

ORDER Relating Cases and Reassigning Action to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 01/30/2015. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY CARLIN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 vs. CLIFF ALLENBY, et al., Defendants. 1:15-cv-00116-GSA (PC) New Case No. 1:15-cv-00116-MJS (PC) ORDER RELATING CASES AND REASSIGNING ACTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J. SENG 16 17 18 On November 25, 2014, Plaintiff filed this Civil Rights Complaint pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. section 1983 challenging Defendants’ assessment, classification and detention of 20 Plaintiff under California’s Sexually Violent Predator Act and failure to provide him outpatient 21 treatment in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. (ECF No. 1.) 22 A number of virtually identical actions have been filed in or transferred to this Court. 23 The Court’s review of these cases reveals that the instant action is related under Local Rule 123 24 to the action entitled Klein v. King, 1:14-cv-01440-MJS (PC). Both actions are based on the 25 same underlying facts and involve overlapping questions of law and fact. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. The Office of the Clerk shall relate this case with case 1:14-cv-01440-MJS (PC); 28 2. This case shall be assigned to the docket of Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng; 1 1 3. The new case number shall be: 1:15-cv-00116-MJS (PC) 2 and all future pleadings and/or correspondence must be so numbered. Use of an incorrect case 3 number or incorrect judge’s initials may result in delay in processing documents and 4 distribution of copies to the judge assigned. 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 30, 2015 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?