Cranford v. King et al
Filing
5
ORDER TO SUBMIT A NON-PRISONER APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY THE $400.00 FILING FEE signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 2/5/2015. (Motion for IFP due by 3/10/2015). (Attachments: # 1 IFP Application) (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
1:15-cv-00118-GSA (PC)
ARCHIE CRANFORD,
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SUBMIT A
NON-PRISONER APPLICATION
TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
OR PAY THE $400.00 FILING FEE
WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
v.
AUDREY KING, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42
U.S.C. ' 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code ' 6600
et seq. are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation
20
Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000).
21
On January 23, 2015, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action, together with
22
23
24
25
26
27
an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915.
However, the
application to proceed in forma pauperis was submitted on the form for a prisoner. Plaintiff shall
be allowed time to submit an application on the appropriate form for a non-prisoner.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
The Clerk=s Office shall send to plaintiff the attached form for application to
proceed in forma pauperis for a non-prisoner;
28
1
2.
1
2
3
Within thirty days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall submit the
completed and signed application to proceed in forma pauperis for a non-prisoner, or in the
alternative, pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action. Failure to comply with this order will
result in dismissal of this action.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 5, 2015
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?