Vickers v. Thompson et al
Filing
12
ORDER Denying 11 Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 03/26/15. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JEREMIAH D. VICKERS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
Case No. 1:15-cv-00129-DLB PC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT
v.
(Document 11)
14
THOMPSON, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff Jeremiah D. Vickers (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in
17
18
this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed his complaint on January 26, 2015.
On March 25, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion for entry of default. Plaintiff states that the
19
20
“court files and record herein show that the Defendants were served with a copy” of the complaint
21
and have failed to file a timely response. ECF No. 11, at 1.
22
Plaintiff’s complaint, however, has not yet been screened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.
23
Until such time as the Court screens Plaintiff’s complaint and finds a cognizable claim, the Court
24
will not order service on any Defendant. As to Plaintiff’s claim that the complaint has been served,
25
there is no such indication on the docket. To the extent that Plaintiff served the complaint himself,
26
such service is ineffective because the complaint has not been screened.
27
///
28
///
1
1
2
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for entry of default is HEREBY DENIED as premature. Fed.
R. Civ. P. 55(a).
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
March 26, 2015
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?