Vickers v. Thompson et al

Filing 96

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Motion for Summary Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc 94 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/5/2018: 7-Day Deadline for Reply. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

JEREMIAH D. VICKERS,

7
8
9

Plaintiff,
v.
THOMPSON, et al.,

10

Defendants.

11

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:15-cv-00129-SAB (PC)
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT NUNC PRO
TUNC
(ECF No. 94)

12

Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Jeremiah D. Vickers’s motion for an extension of

13

time to file his response to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff’s response was

14

provided for mailing approximately fourteen days late. He cites a delay in the mail, law library

15

closures, and his mandatory inmate job assignment as cause for his delay. Plaintiff seeks for his

16

response, which was included with his motion, to be deemed timely filed.

17

Because of the brief delay here which will not prejudice Defendants, and good cause

18

being shown, Plaintiff’s request is granted. Plaintiff’s opposition, filed on March 2, 2018, is

19

deemed timely filed. Defendants reply to the opposition, if any, is due within seven (7) days of

20

the date of this order.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23

Dated:

24
25
26
27
28

March 5, 2018
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE