Cochneuer v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
Filing
6
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-12). CASE TRANSFERRED to the Eastern District of Louisiana. MDL No. 2592. (Robles, S)
Case Case MDL No. 2592 Document 235 Filed 02/12/15 Page Page 1 of 3
2:14-md-02592-EEF-MBN Document 202 Filed 02/12/15 1 of 3
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
FEB 13 2015
Feb 20 2015
IN RE: XARELTO (RIVAROXABAN)
PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
MDL No. 2592
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO 12)
On December 12, 2014, the Panel transferred 20 civil action(s) to the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1407. See _F.Supp.2d_ (J.P.M.L. 2014). Since that time, 130 additional action(s) have
been transferred to the Eastern District of Louisiana. With the consent of that court, all such actions
have been assigned to the Honorable Eldon E Fallon.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the Eastern District of Louisiana and assigned to
Judge Fallon.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the
Eastern District of Louisiana for the reasons stated in the order of December 12, 2014, and, with the
consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Eldon E Fallon.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall
be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the
Panel within this 7 day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
FOR THE PANEL:
Feb 12, 2015
Jeffery N. Lüthi
Clerk of the Panel
Case Case MDL No. 2592 Document 235 Filed 02/12/15 Page Page 2 of 3
2:14-md-02592-EEF-MBN Document 202 Filed 02/12/15 2 of 3
IN RE: XARELTO (RIVAROXABAN)
PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
MDL No. 2592
SCHEDULE CTO 12
DIST
TAG ALONG ACTIONS
DIV.
C.A.NO.
CASE CAPTION
2
15 00111
Whitley et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC
et al
ARIZONA
AZ
CALIFORNIA CENTRAL
CAC
2
15 00585
CAC
2
15 00588
CAC
2
15 00589
CAC
2
15 00590
CAC
2
15 00673
CAC
5
15 00164
Bonnie Baird v. Janssen Research and Development
LLC et al
Jeanette James v. Janssen Research and Development
LLC et al
Clyde Kelly v. Janssen Research and Development LLC
et al
Sharon Woods vs. Janssen Research & Development
LLC et al
Craig Erquhart v. Janseen Research and Development
LLC et al
Mary Jane Vance v. Janssen Research and Development
LLC et al
CALIFORNIA EASTERN
CAE
1
15 00140
Cochneuer v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et
al
CALIFORNIA NORTHERN
CAN
4
15 00357
Rau v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
15 00046
15 00052
15 00165
Ginger v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
Williams v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
Everson v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
FLORIDA MIDDLE
FLM
FLM
FLM
2
2
8
FLORIDA SOUTHERN
FLS
9
15 80082
Case Case MDL No. 2592 Document 235 Filed 02/12/15 Page Page 3 of 3
2:14-md-02592-EEF-MBN Document 202 Filed 02/12/15 3 of 3
Costonis et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC
et al
ILLINOIS NORTHERN
ILN
15 00781
Matthews v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et
al
15 00018
Ward et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et
al
15 00023
Guthrie v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
1
15 00143
Maillet v. Janssen Research & Development L L C et al
0
15 00206
Lewis v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
15 00194
Littlejohn et al v. Janssen Research & Development
LLC, et al Opposed 2/11/15
15 00057
Wright v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
LLC et al
1
KENTUCKY EASTERN
KYE
5
KENTUCKY WESTERN
KYW
5
LOUISIANA WESTERN
LAW
MINNESOTA
MN
MISSOURI EASTERN
MOE
4
OHIO SOUTHERN
OHS
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?