Forte v. Merced County, et al.
Filing
3
ORDER granting 2 Motion to Proceed IFP and directing Plaintiff to return consent forms signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/3/2015. (Filing Deadline: 2/19/2015).(Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
EUGENE FORTE,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
CASE NO. 1:15-cv-0147---BAM
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF
FEES OR COSTS
(Doc. 2).
v.
MERCED COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.
11
12
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
RETURN CONSENT FORMS
/
13
14
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to
15
Title 28 of the United States Code section 1915(a). Plaintiff has made the showing required by section
16
1915(a), and accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. §
17
1915(a).
18
Plaintiff is advised that the Court is required to screen complaints of pro se litigants pursuant to
19
Title 28 of the United States Code section 1915. The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion
20
thereof if the litigant has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a
21
claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant(s) who is
22
immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). As a result, summonses will not issue at this time.
23
The Court will direct the United States Marshal to serve Plaintiff’s complaint only after the Court has
24
screened the complaint and determined that it contains cognizable claims for relief against the named
25
defendants.
26
Plaintiff is further advised that the Eastern District of California has, by far, the highest
27
weighted caseload per judge in the entire country and there are presently a large number of cases
28
awaiting preliminary screening. The Court screens complaints in the order in which they are filed and
1
1
strives to avoid delays whenever possible. However, due to the vast caseload of the Court, and the
2
Court’s diligent handling of each individual case, rulings and decisions often take time despite the
3
Court’s best efforts. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s case will be screened in due course and appropriate
4
orders will issue whenever possible.
5
Finally, the Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a “Consent to Magistrate Jurisdiction Form”
6
to Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall complete the form and advise the Court whether or not he will consent to
7
Magistrate Judge jurisdiction no later than February 19, 2015.
8
Failure to complete the form may result in dismissal of this action.
9
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
February 3, 2015
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?