Pierson et al v. Heath
Filing
8
Order re extension of time, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 3/23/2015. (Answer Deadline: 4/21/2015) (Rosales, O)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
EBONY PIERSON AND CRUZ
RAMIREZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND
ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS
SIMILARLY SITUATED,
Case No. 1:15-CV-00149---SMS
10
Plaintiffs,
11
12
13
14
15
16
ORDER
v.
JOHN C. HEATH ATTORNEY AT
LAW, PLLC, d.b.a. LEXINGTON
LAW FIRM,
MAGISTRATE JUDGE:
HON. SANDRA M. SNYDER
Defendant.
17
18
Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to
19 Complaint, the Court finds that there is good cause to grant the stipulation. Therefore, it
20 is hereby ORDERED:
21
22
23
1. Defendant’s time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint
shall be extended up to and including April 21, 2015.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25 Dated: March 23, 2015
26
/s/ SANDRA M. SNYDER
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
1
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?