Pierson et al v. Heath

Filing 8

Order re extension of time, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 3/23/2015. (Answer Deadline: 4/21/2015) (Rosales, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 EBONY PIERSON AND CRUZ RAMIREZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Case No. 1:15-CV-00149---SMS 10 Plaintiffs, 11 12 13 14 15 16 ORDER v. JOHN C. HEATH ATTORNEY AT LAW, PLLC, d.b.a. LEXINGTON LAW FIRM, MAGISTRATE JUDGE: HON. SANDRA M. SNYDER Defendant. 17 18 Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to 19 Complaint, the Court finds that there is good cause to grant the stipulation. Therefore, it 20 is hereby ORDERED: 21 22 23 1. Defendant’s time to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint shall be extended up to and including April 21, 2015. IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: March 23, 2015 26 /s/ SANDRA M. SNYDER U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 1 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?