Glover v. California State University Fresno et al

Filing 49

STIPULATION and ORDER to continue the Scheduling Conference from 1/26/2016 to 4/4/2016 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. A joint scheduling report is due one week before the new conference date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/5/2016. (Hernandez, M)

1
2
3
4

MICHAEL K. HAGEMANN, ESQ. (SBN 264570)
CLAY R. WILKINSON, ESQ.
M.K. HAGEMANN, P.C.
1801 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 2400
CENTURY CITY, CA 90067
T. 310.773.4900 | F. 310.773.4901
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

5

Attorneys for Plaintiff EDGAR GLOVER
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

TERRY A. WILLS, ESQ. (SBN 133962)
CHRISTOPHER S. ALVAREZ, ESQ (SBN 294795)
COOK BROWN, LLP
555 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 425
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814
T. 916.442.3100 | F. 916.442.4227
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY and JANICE A.
PARTEN

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – FRESNO DIVISION

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

EDGAR GLOVER, an individual,
Plaintiff,
v.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY,
California public entity JANICE A. PARTEN,
an individual in her individual capacity;
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY
EMPLOYEES UNION (CSUEU), a California
corporation and labor organization; and DOES 1150,

Case No. 1:15-CV-000152-SAB
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONTINUING SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE

Defendants.

25

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff EDGAR GLOVER (“Plaintiff”)

26

and Defendants THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY

27

(“Defendant California State University”) and JANICE A. PARTEN (“Defendant Parten”) by and

28

through their counsel of record, that the Scheduling Conference set for January 26, 2016 be

1

continued for 45 days or as soon thereafter as the matter may be set.

2

Good cause exists for the continuance as Plaintiff and Defendants California State University

3

and Parten, by and through their counsel, have agreed to mediate the above-entitled matter. The

4

parties agree that the January 26, 2016 Scheduling Conference should be continued in order to allow

5

the parties to mediate this matter and prevent additional costs from incurring as a result of litigation.

6

All other deadlines triggered by the Scheduling Conference should also be continued, to include the

7

Rule 26(f) conference and Joint Scheduling Report.

8

DATED: December 31, 2015

M.K. HAGEMANN, P.C.
CLAY R. WILKINSON, ESQ.

9

By:

10

/s/ Clay R. Wilkinson
______
Attorneys for Plaintiff EDGAR GLOVER

11
12

DATED: December 31, 2015

COOK BROWN, LLP
TERRY A. WILLS, ESQ.

13

By:
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

/s/ Terry A. Wills
Attorneys for Defendants THE BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE
UNIVERSITY and JANICE A. PARTEN

ORDER
1
2

IT IS SO ORDERED, the Scheduling Conference set for January 26, 2016 will be continued

3

to April 4, 2016 at 10:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. A joint scheduling report

4

is due one week before the conference date.

5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 5, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28