Guzman v. Gruma Corporation et al

Filing 27

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 3/6/2015 ORDERING that the 26 Order is WITHDRAWN. The hearing on the 9 , 10 dismissal motions filed 2/4/2015, is RESCHEDULED to commence at 9:00 a.m. on 4/13/2015. The hearing on the 6 remand motion is still scheduled on 3/16/2015. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 OSCAR GUZMAN, 9 10 11 12 13 No. 1:15-cv-00159-GEB-SKO Plaintiff, v. GRUMA CORP., CHUCK DAWSON, and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, ORDER WITHDRAWING THE COURT’S ORDER FILED ON MARCH 5, 2015 Defendants. 14 15 I have considered an email communication sent to the 16 courtroom deputy clerk yesterday in which Defendants’ pro hac 17 vice counsel, Tom C. Lenox, states: 18 19 20 21 22 23 The order dismisses as moot both our previously filed motions to dismiss, one of which was a motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, compel arbitration. This motion would still seemingly be relevant despite the filed FAC because the motion turns on whether there is a valid arbitration agreement, not the pleadings. How should we interpret the order’s effect on the motion to compel arbitration? 24 This email concerns the order filed on March 5, 2015 25 (ECF No. 26). The March 5, 2015 Order should not have issued and 26 is, therefore, withdrawn. 27 Further, the hearing on the dismissal motions filed 28 February 4, 2015, (ECF Nos. 9-10), is rescheduled to commence at 1 1 9:00 a.m. on April 13, 2015. The hearing on the remand motion, 2 (ECF No. 6), is still scheduled on March 16, 2015. 3 Dated: March 6, 2015 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?