Guzman v. Gruma Corporation et al
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 3/6/2015 ORDERING that the 26 Order is WITHDRAWN. The hearing on the 9 , 10 dismissal motions filed 2/4/2015, is RESCHEDULED to commence at 9:00 a.m. on 4/13/2015. The hearing on the 6 remand motion is still scheduled on 3/16/2015. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
OSCAR GUZMAN,
9
10
11
12
13
No. 1:15-cv-00159-GEB-SKO
Plaintiff,
v.
GRUMA CORP., CHUCK DAWSON,
and DOES 1 through 20,
inclusive,
ORDER WITHDRAWING THE COURT’S
ORDER FILED ON MARCH 5, 2015
Defendants.
14
15
I have considered an email communication sent to the
16
courtroom deputy clerk yesterday in which Defendants’ pro hac
17
vice counsel, Tom C. Lenox, states:
18
19
20
21
22
23
The
order
dismisses
as
moot
both
our
previously filed motions to dismiss, one of
which was a motion to dismiss, or in the
alternative, compel arbitration. This motion
would still seemingly be relevant despite the
filed FAC because the motion turns on whether
there is a valid arbitration agreement, not
the pleadings. How should we interpret the
order’s effect on the motion to compel
arbitration?
24
This email concerns the order filed on March 5, 2015
25
(ECF No. 26). The March 5, 2015 Order should not have issued and
26
is, therefore, withdrawn.
27
Further, the hearing on the dismissal motions filed
28
February 4, 2015, (ECF Nos. 9-10), is rescheduled to commence at
1
1
9:00 a.m. on April 13, 2015. The hearing on the remand motion,
2
(ECF No. 6), is still scheduled on March 16, 2015.
3
Dated:
March 6, 2015
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?