Jose Escobedo v. Linenbach Auto Parts, Inc. et al
Filing
16
ORDER re: Second Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/26/2015. (Martinez, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
KATHLEEN M. HARTMAN, Esq. (SBN 219934)
CALLAHAN, THOMPSON, SHERMAN & CAUDILL, LLP
2601 Main Street, Suite 800
Irvine, California 92614
Tel :
(949) 261-2872
Fax :
(949) 261-6060
Email :
khartman@ctsclaw.com
Attorneys for Defendants,
LINENBACH AUTO PARTS, INC.,
dba NAPA AUTO PARTS; BERYL E.
LINENBACH, as Trustee of the JOHN
& BERYL LINENBACH FAMILY
TRUST A UTA 3/19/91, and as Trustee
of the JOHN & BERYL LINENBACH
FAMILY TRUST C UTA 3/19/91
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
JOSE ESCOBEDO,
14
Plaintiff,
15
16
vs.
17
18
19
20
21
22
LINENBACH AUTO PARTS, INC.,
dba NAPA AUTO PARTS; BERYL E.
LINENBACH, as Trustee of the JOHN
& BERYL LINENBACH FAMILY
TRUST A UTA 3/19/91, and as Trustee
of the JOHN & BERYL LINENBACH
FAMILY TRUST C UTA 3/19/91;
Case No.: 1:15-CV-00161-KJM-GSA
Complaint Date: 1/29/2015
ORDER RE: SECOND
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
TO RESPOND TO INITIAL
COMPLAINT
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1ORDER RE: SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT
1
The Court, having reviewed the parties’ Second Stipulation to Extend Time to
2
Respond to Initial Complaint, and for good cause shown, hereby orders that the
3
deadline for Defendants Linebach Auto Parts, Inc., dba Napa Auto Parts, and Beryl
4
E. Linenbach, as Trustee of the John & Beryl Linenbach Family Trust A UTA
5
3/19/91, and as Trustee of the John & Beryl Linenbach Family Trust C UTA 3/19/91
6
to respond to the Initial Complaint be continued to May 14, 2015.
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 26, 2015
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2ORDER RE: SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?