Gregge v. California Department of Corrections, et al
Filing
100
Stipulation and Order to continue scheduling conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/7/2015. (Scheduling Conference currently set for 8/17/2015 has been CONTINUED AND RESET to a Status Conference for 9/29/2015 at 01:00 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone) (Rosales, O)
1
OFFICES OF
2
═════════
3
PAVONE & FONNER
═════════
4
A LAW PARTNERSHIP
5
6
7
8
9
BENJAMIN PAVONE, ESQ., SBN 181826
HILLARY GRANT, ESQ., SBN 297849
7676 HAZARD CENTER DRIVE, 5TH FLOOR
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92108
TELEPHONE: 619 224 8885
FACSIMILE: 619 224 8886
PAVONE EMAIL: bpavone@cox.net
GRANT EMAIL: hillgrant.hg@gmail.com
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
LORENZO GREGGE, JR.
10
KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672
Attorney General of California
MICHELLE L. ANGUS, SBN 210031
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
TYLER V. HEATH, SBN 271478
Deputy Attorney General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 94425
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: (916) 327-9722
Fax: (916) 324-5205
Email: Tyler.Heath@doj.ca.gov
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
CATE AND YATES
PAVONE & FONNER, LLP
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
17
LORENZO GREGGE, JR.
PLAINTIFF,
v.
18
19
20
21
CASE NO.: 1:15-CV-00176-LJO-SAB
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al,
DEFENDANTS.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
_________________________________________________________________
GREGGE v. CDCR., et al – CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00176-LJO-SAB
STIPULATION & PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
1
Plaintiff, by and through his counsel, Attorneys Benjamin Pavone and Hillary Grant,
2
and Defendants, by and through their counsel, Attorney Tyler Heath, hereby stipulate as
3
follows:
4
1.
Currently before the District Court are the Plaintiff’s Objections to the
5
Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations and Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiff’s
6
Objection to the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendations.
7
2.
On July 14, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation to postpone the scheduling
8
conference until the Court ruled on the pleadings. The Court postponed the Scheduling
9
Conference until August 17, 2015, with a report due one week prior. Docket 97.
10
3.
The District Court has not yet ruled on the objections and therefore the
PAVONE & FONNER, LLP
11
parties agree that it is premature to enter a scheduling order, as that ruling is potentially
12
case-dispositive. The parties wish to continue the conference until September 29, 2015, the
13
same date as other Valley Fever cases are being managed for scheduling, and given the state
14
of the pleadings in this matter, convert the scheduling conference to a status conference.
15
So stipulated.
16
17
Dated: August 6, 2015
PAVONE & FONNER, LLP
18
19
Hillary Grant, Esq.
Direct: 720 320 1549
Attorneys for Lorenzo Gregge, Jr.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Dated: August 6, 2015
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
MICHELLE L. ANGUS
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
Tyler V. Heath
Tyler V. Heath
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants
Cate and Yates
______________________________________________________________________________________
GREGGE v. CDCR., et al – CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00176-LJO-SAB – PAGE 2
STIPULATION & PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
1
ORDER
2
Based on the Stipulation of the parties as set forth above, and good cause having been
3
shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the scheduling conference set for August 17, 2015, and
4
its related obligations (Dkt. No. 97), is continued to 1:00 pm on September 29, 2015 and will
5
be handled as a status conference.
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
August 7, 2015
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
PAVONE & FONNER, LLP
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
______________________________________________________________________________________
GREGGE v. CDCR., et al – CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00176-LJO-SAB – PAGE 3
STIPULATION & PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?