Gregge v. California Department of Corrections, et al

Filing 100

Stipulation and Order to continue scheduling conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/7/2015. (Scheduling Conference currently set for 8/17/2015 has been CONTINUED AND RESET to a Status Conference for 9/29/2015 at 01:00 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone) (Rosales, O)

Download PDF
1 OFFICES OF 2 ═════════ 3 PAVONE & FONNER ═════════ 4 A LAW PARTNERSHIP 5 6 7 8 9 BENJAMIN PAVONE, ESQ., SBN 181826 HILLARY GRANT, ESQ., SBN 297849 7676 HAZARD CENTER DRIVE, 5TH FLOOR SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92108 TELEPHONE: 619 224 8885 FACSIMILE: 619 224 8886 PAVONE EMAIL: bpavone@cox.net GRANT EMAIL: hillgrant.hg@gmail.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF LORENZO GREGGE, JR. 10 KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672 Attorney General of California MICHELLE L. ANGUS, SBN 210031 Supervising Deputy Attorney General TYLER V. HEATH, SBN 271478 Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 94425 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 327-9722 Fax: (916) 324-5205 Email: Tyler.Heath@doj.ca.gov ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS CATE AND YATES PAVONE & FONNER, LLP 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 17 LORENZO GREGGE, JR. PLAINTIFF, v. 18 19 20 21 CASE NO.: 1:15-CV-00176-LJO-SAB STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al, DEFENDANTS. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 _________________________________________________________________ GREGGE v. CDCR., et al – CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00176-LJO-SAB STIPULATION & PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 1 Plaintiff, by and through his counsel, Attorneys Benjamin Pavone and Hillary Grant, 2 and Defendants, by and through their counsel, Attorney Tyler Heath, hereby stipulate as 3 follows: 4 1. Currently before the District Court are the Plaintiff’s Objections to the 5 Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations and Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiff’s 6 Objection to the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendations. 7 2. On July 14, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation to postpone the scheduling 8 conference until the Court ruled on the pleadings. The Court postponed the Scheduling 9 Conference until August 17, 2015, with a report due one week prior. Docket 97. 10 3. The District Court has not yet ruled on the objections and therefore the PAVONE & FONNER, LLP 11 parties agree that it is premature to enter a scheduling order, as that ruling is potentially 12 case-dispositive. The parties wish to continue the conference until September 29, 2015, the 13 same date as other Valley Fever cases are being managed for scheduling, and given the state 14 of the pleadings in this matter, convert the scheduling conference to a status conference. 15 So stipulated. 16 17 Dated: August 6, 2015 PAVONE & FONNER, LLP 18 19 Hillary Grant, Esq. Direct: 720 320 1549 Attorneys for Lorenzo Gregge, Jr. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Dated: August 6, 2015 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California MICHELLE L. ANGUS Supervising Deputy Attorney General Tyler V. Heath Tyler V. Heath Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants Cate and Yates ______________________________________________________________________________________ GREGGE v. CDCR., et al – CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00176-LJO-SAB – PAGE 2 STIPULATION & PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 1 ORDER 2 Based on the Stipulation of the parties as set forth above, and good cause having been 3 shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the scheduling conference set for August 17, 2015, and 4 its related obligations (Dkt. No. 97), is continued to 1:00 pm on September 29, 2015 and will 5 be handled as a status conference. 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 7, 2015 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 PAVONE & FONNER, LLP 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ______________________________________________________________________________________ GREGGE v. CDCR., et al – CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00176-LJO-SAB – PAGE 3 STIPULATION & PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?