Vargas v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Filing
10
SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/19/2015. Consent/Decline Deadline 5/29/2015. Pleading Amendment Deadline 8/10/2015. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 6/26/2015; Non-Expert 3/25/2016; Expert 5/27/2016. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 11/12/2015 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 6/3/2016; Hearing by 7/1/2016. Dispositive Motion Dead lines: Filed by 7/13/2016; Hearing by 8/24/2016. Settlement Conference set for 1/8/2016 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Pretrial Conference set for 11/30/2016 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Jury Trial set for 1/24/2017 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
VIRGINIA VARGAS,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
15
v.
J.C. PENNY CORPORATION, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1: 15-CV-00177 - LJO - JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 8/10/2015
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 6/26/2015
Non-Expert: 3/25/2016
Expert: 5/27/2016
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
11/12/2015, 8:30 a.m.
16
17
Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 6/3/2016
Hearing: 7/1/2016
18
19
Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 7/13/2016
Hearing: 8/24/2016
20
21
22
Settlement Conference:
1/8/2016 at 9:30 a.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA
23
24
Pre-Trial Conference:
11/30/2016 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 4
25
26
27
Trial: 1/24/2017 at 8:30 a.m.
Courtroom 4
Jury trial: 5 days
28
1
1
I.
May 19, 2015.
2
3
Date of Scheduling Conference
II.
Appearances of Counsel
4
Craig Johnson appeared on behalf of Plaintiff.
5
Benjamin Johnson appeared on behalf of Defendant.
6
III.
Magistrate Judge Consent:
7
Notice of Congested Docket and Court Policy of Trailing
8
Due to the District Judges’ heavy caseload, the newly adopted policy of the Fresno Division of
9
the Eastern District is to trail all civil cases. The parties are hereby notified that for a trial date set
10
before a District Judge, the parties will trail indefinitely behind any higher priority criminal or older
11
civil case set on the same date until a courtroom becomes available. The trial date will not be reset to a
12
continued date.
The Magistrate Judges’ availability is far more realistic and accommodating to parties than that
13
14
of the U.S. District Judges who carry the heaviest caseloads in the nation and who must prioritize
15
criminal and older civil cases over more recently filed civil cases. A United States Magistrate Judge
16
may conduct trials, including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of
17
Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States
18
Magistrate Judge is taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit.
The Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California, whenever possible, is utilizing United
19
20
States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant to the
21
Local Rules, Appendix A, such reassignments will be random, and the parties will receive no advance
22
notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern
23
District of California.
Therefore, the parties are directed to consider consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to
24
25
conduct all further proceedings, including trial. Within 10 days of the date of this order, counsel
26
SHALL file a consent/decline form (provided by the Court at the inception of this case) indicating
27
whether they will consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge.
28
///
2
1
IV.
Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or
2
3
motion to amend, no later than August 10, 2015.
4
V.
5
6
7
8
9
Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)
on or before June 26, 2015.
The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before March
25, 2016, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before May 27, 2016.1
The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses2, in writing, on or before April 8, 2016,
10
and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before April 29, 2016. The written designation of retained and
11
non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C) and
12
shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in compliance with
13
this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered through such
14
experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.
15
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts
16
and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions
17
included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may
18
include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.
19
20
21
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement
disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled on November 12, 2015 at 8:30 a.m. before the
22
Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield,
23
California, 93301. A Joint Mid-Discovery Status Conference Report, carefully prepared and executed
24
by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in CM/ECF, one full week prior to the Conference, and shall
25
be e-mailed, in Word format, to JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov. The joint statement SHALL outline the
26
27
28
1
Counsel agreed that depositions of treating physicians may be taken during the non-expert discovery period.
In the event an expert will offer opinions related to an independent medical or mental health evaluation, the
examination SHALL occur sufficiently in advance of the disclosure deadline so the expert’s report fully details the expert’s
opinions in this regard.
2
3
1
discovery that has been completed and that which needs to be completed as well as any impediments to
2
completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this order. Counsel may appear via
3
CourtCall, providing a written request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk
4
no later than five court days before the noticed hearing date.
5
VI.
6
Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later
7
than June 3, 2016, and heard on or before July 1, 2016. Non-dispositive motions are heard before the
8
Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge at the United States Courthouse in
9
Bakersfield, California.
10
No written discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned
11
Magistrate Judge. A party with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good
12
faith effort to resolve by agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the
13
moving party promptly shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate
14
Judge. It shall be the obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the
15
court. To schedule this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact Courtroom Deputy Clerk,
16
Susan Hall at (661) 326-6620 or via email at SHall@caed.uscourts.gov. Counsel must comply with
17
Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice
18
and dropped from calendar.
19
In scheduling such motions, the Magistrate Judge may grant applications for an order shortening
20
time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an order shortening time, the
21
notice of motion must comply with Local Rule 251.
22
Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions via CourtCall, providing a written
23
request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than five court days
24
before the noticed hearing date.
25
All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than July 13, 2016, and heard no later
26
than August 24, 2016, in Courtroom 4 at 8:30 a.m. before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill, United
27
States District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56
28
and Local Rules 230 and 260.
4
1
VII.
Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication
2
At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary
3
adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues
4
to be raised in the motion.
5
The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a
6
question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole
7
or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the
8
issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the
9
expense of briefing a summary judgment motion; 6) to arrive at a joint statement of undisputed facts.
10
The moving party shall initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed
11
statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement
12
of undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be
13
deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the
14
joint statement of undisputed facts.
In the notice of motion the moving party shall certify that the parties have met and conferred as
15
16
ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer.
17
VIII. Pre-Trial Conference Date
18
November 30, 2016, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before Judge O'Neill.
19
The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).
20
The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,
21
directly to Judge O'Neill's chambers, by email at LJOorders@caed.uscourts.gov.
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the
22
23
Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.
24
The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the
25
Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the
26
Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.
27
IX.
28
Trial Date
January 24, 2017, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 4 before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill,
5
1
United States District Court Judge.
2
A.
This is a jury trial.
3
B.
Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 5 days.
4
C.
Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of
5
California, Rule 285.
6
X.
7
Settlement Conference
A Settlement Conference is scheduled for January 8, 2016 at 9:30 a.m., located at 510 19th
8
Street, Bakersfield, California. The settlement conference will be conducted by Magistrate Judge
9
Thurston. If any party prefers that the settlement conference be conducted by a judicial officer
10
who is not normally assigned to this matter, that party is directed to notify the Court no later
11
than 60 days in advance of the scheduled settlement conference to allow sufficient time for
12
another judicial officer to be assigned to handle the conference.
13
Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case
14
shall appear at the Settlement Conference with the parties and the person or persons having full
15
authority to negotiate and settle the case on any terms3 at the conference. Consideration of
16
settlement is a serious matter that requires preparation prior to the settlement conference. Set forth
17
below are the procedures the Court will employ, absent good cause, in conducting the conference.
18
At least 21 days before the settlement conference, Plaintiff SHALL submit to Defendant via
19
fax or e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful4 settlement demand which includes
20
a brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate. Thereafter, no later than 14 days before
21
the settlement conference, Defendant SHALL respond, via fax or e-mail, with an acceptance of the
22
offer or with a meaningful counteroffer, which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements
are subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented by a
person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved in the
process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements. To the extent possible the representative shall have the
authority, if he or she deems it appropriate, to settle the action on terms consistent with the opposing party's most recent
demand.
4
“Meaningful” means that the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the offering
party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the other party. If,
however, the offering party is only willing to offer a settlement which it knows the other party will not accept, this should
trigger a recognition the case is not in a settlement posture and the parties should confer about continuing or vacating the
settlement conference via stipulation.
6
1
is appropriate.
If settlement is not achieved, each party SHALL attach copies of their settlement offers to
2
3
their Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described below. Copies of these documents
4
shall not be filed on the court docket.
CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT
5
At least five court days prior to the Settlement Conference, the parties shall submit, directly to
6
7
Judge Thurston's chambers by e-mail to JLTOrders@caed.uscourts.gov, a Confidential Settlement
8
Conference Statement. The statement should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on
9
any other party, although the parties may file a Notice of Lodging of Settlement Conference
10
Statement. Each statement shall be clearly marked "confidential" with the date and time of the
11
Settlement Conference indicated prominently thereon.
12
The Confidential Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following:
13
A.
A brief statement of the facts of the case.
14
B.
A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon
15
which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties' likelihood of
16
prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in dispute.
17
C.
A summary of the proceedings to date.
18
D.
An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial and trial.
19
E.
The relief sought.
20
F.
The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history
of past settlement discussions, offers and demands.
21
22
XI.
Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other
23
Techniques to Shorten Trial
24
Not applicable at this time.
25
26
27
28
XII.
Related Matters Pending
There are no pending related matters.
XIII. Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
7
1
and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any
2
amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently
3
handle its increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow the Rules as provided
4
in both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of
5
California.
6
XIV. Effect of this Order
7
The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most
8
suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the
9
parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered
10
to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by
11
subsequent status conference.
12
The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a
13
showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations
14
extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by
15
affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause
16
for granting the relief requested.
17
Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.
18
19
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
May 19, 2015
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?