Gutilla v. Aerotek, Inc.,

Filing 28

JOINT Status Report and Request for Additional Time to Submit Stipulated Dismissal; ORDER - all dates and hearings are hereby vacated and the Court will retain jurisdiction of this matter. The parties shall file a StipulatedRequest for Dismissal within 30 days of this Order or by January 23, 2017. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/22/2016. (Herman, H)

1
2
3
4

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
John S. Battenfeld, Bar No. 119513
[e-mail]
300 South Grand Avenue
Twenty-Second Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071-3132
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: +1.213.612.2501

5
6
7
8

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
Shannon Nakabayashi, Bar No. 215469
[e-mail]
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, California 94105-1596
Telephone:
+1.415.442.1000
Facsimile:
+1.415.442.1001

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Attorneys for Defendant
AEROTEK, INC.
ROBERT J. WASSERMAN, Bar No. 258538
[e-mail]
VLADIMIR J. KOZINA, Bar No. 284645
[e-mail]
MAYALL HURLEY, P.C.
2453 Grand Canal Blvd.
Stockton, CA 95207.8253
Telephone:
209.477.3833
Facsimile:
209.473.4818
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LAURA GUTILLA

17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20

FRESNO DIVISION

21
22
LAURA GUTILLA,

Case No. 1:15-CV-00191-DAD-BAM

23
Plaintiff,
24
v.

JOINT STATUS REPORT AND REQUEST
FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO SUBMIT
STIPULATED DISMISSAL; ORDER

25
26
27

AEROTEK, INC., a corporation; and
DOES 1-100 inclusive,
Defendants.

28
JOINT STATUS REPORT AND REQUEST
FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO SUBMIT
STIPULATED DISMISSAL

Complaint Filed: December 31, 2014

1

Pursuant to the Court’s November 22, 2016 Order, Plaintiff LAURA GUTILLA (“Plaintiff”)

2

and Defendant AEROTEK, INC. (together “the Parties”) hereby submit their Joint Status Report and

3

Request for Additional Time to Submit Stipulated Dismissal.

4

The Parties to this litigation have agreed to a settlement whereby all claims will be dismissed.

5

The settlement document has been finalized and Plaintiff has signed the agreement. Accordingly,

6

the Parties anticipate that a Stipulated Request for Dismissal will be filed within the next thirty days.

7

The case involves individual claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act as well as Private Attorneys

8

General Act allegations and therefore Court approval is required.

9
10

THEREFORE the Parties respectfully request an additional 30 days or until January
23, 2017 to file their Stipulated Request for Dismissal.

11
12

DATED: December 21, 2016

MAYALL HURLEY, P.C.

13
By__/s/ Vladimir J. Kozina
Robert J. Wasserman
Vladimir J. Kozina
Attorneys for Plaintiff

14
15
16
17

DATED: December 21, 2016

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

By_/s/_Shannon B. Nakabayashi
John S. Battenfeld
Shannon B. Nakabayashi
Attorneys for Defendant

1

ORDER

2

Pursuant to the foregoing, and good cause appearing, all dates and hearings are hereby

3

vacated and the Court will retain jurisdiction of this matter. The parties shall file a Stipulated

4
Request for Dismissal within 30 days of this Order or by January 23, 2017.
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8

Dated: December 22, 2016

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

/s/ Barbara

A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE