Curry v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 17

STIPULATION and ORDER for First Extension of Time for Defendant to File Responsive Brief: that Defendant shall have an extension of time, to an including November 9, 2015, in which to file Defendants opposition to Plaintiffs Brief in Support of Remand. All other dates in the Courts Scheduling Order are modified accordingly. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/20/2015. (Herman, H)

1
2
3
4

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DEBORAH L. STACHEL
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
BRENDA M. PULLIN
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration

5
6
7
8
9

160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant

10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

GREGORY ALAN CURRY,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 1:15-CV-200-BAM
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR FIRST
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT
TO FILE RESPONSIVE BRIEF

23
24
25

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel

26

of record, that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 30 days to respond to Plaintiff’s brief

27

in support of remand. The extension is necessary because the undersigned attorney for Defendant

28

was unexpectedly on leave from September 21, 2015, to October 7, 2015, due to a medical

1

1
2

emergency. The undersigned attorney for Defendant is diligently working to catch up on her full
caseload, but will need additional time to address this case among the numerous cases which have

3
4

also fallen due in her absence.
There have been no prior extensions in this case. Defendant’s motion was previously due on

5

or before October 8, 2015; the new deadline would be November 9, 2015, as the 30th day falls on a

6

Saturday.

7

The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.

8
9

Dated: October 13, 2015

10

By: /s/ Jonathan Omar Pena
(as authorized via e-mail)
JONATHAN OMAR PENA
Attorney for Plaintiff

11
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney

12
13
Dated: October 8, 2015
14
15

By:/s/ Brenda M. Pullin
BRENDA M. PULLIN
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant

16
17
18
19

ORDER

20
21
22
23
24

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that Defendant shall have an extension of time, to an including November 9, 2015, in
which to file Defendant’s opposition to Plaintiff’s Brief in Support of Remand. All other dates in the
Court’s Scheduling Order are modified accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27

Dated:

/s/ Barbara

October 20, 2015

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28

2