Rouse v. Brown et al

Filing 18

ORDER Directing Plaintiff To File Amended Complaint, Thirty-Day Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/9/2015.(First Amended Complaint due by 3/12/2015) (Attachments: # 1 Amended Complaint)(Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRUCE A. ROUSE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 Case No. 1:15-cv-00205 DLB PC ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT v. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 14 BROWN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Bruce A. Rouse (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 18 forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed his complaint in the 19 United States District Court for the Northern District of California on March 6, 2013. The Court 20 dismissed the complaint without leave to amend on March 22, 2013. On June 18, 2014, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part. 21 22 The Court determined that Plaintiff should be granted leave to amend to allege a claim for damages 23 against Defendants Brown and Beard in their individual capacities. The Court affirmed the 24 dismissal on all other grounds. On February 5, 2015, the Northern District transferred the action to this Court. 25 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, Plaintiff SHALL file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date 2 of service of this order. Plaintiff may only amend the above claim. Plaintiff’s First Amended 3 Complaint will be subject to screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Dennis February 9, 2015 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?