Rouse v. Brown et al
Filing
18
ORDER Directing Plaintiff To File Amended Complaint, Thirty-Day Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/9/2015.(First Amended Complaint due by 3/12/2015) (Attachments: # 1 Amended Complaint)(Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BRUCE A. ROUSE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
Case No. 1:15-cv-00205 DLB PC
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT
v.
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
14
BROWN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff Bruce A. Rouse (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se and in
18
forma pauperis in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed his complaint in the
19
United States District Court for the Northern District of California on March 6, 2013. The Court
20
dismissed the complaint without leave to amend on March 22, 2013.
On June 18, 2014, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part.
21
22
The Court determined that Plaintiff should be granted leave to amend to allege a claim for damages
23
against Defendants Brown and Beard in their individual capacities. The Court affirmed the
24
dismissal on all other grounds.
On February 5, 2015, the Northern District transferred the action to this Court.
25
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, Plaintiff SHALL file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date
2
of service of this order. Plaintiff may only amend the above claim. Plaintiff’s First Amended
3
Complaint will be subject to screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
February 9, 2015
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?