Garza v. Fisher

Filing 85

ORDER Directing Clerk to Close Case signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 05/16/2017. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
Case No. 1:15-cv-00234-DAD-SKO

FERNIE GARZA,

9
10

Plaintiff,

11

v.

12

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE
CASE
(Doc. 84)

RAYTHEL FISHER, JR., et al.,

13
Defendants.
_____________________________________/

14
15
16

On May 15, 2017, the parties filed a joint Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal with
17
Prejudice, in which the parties notify the Court that this action has been dismissed with prejudice
18
19

(the “Stipulation”). (Doc. 84.) This Stipulation is signed by all parties who have appeared in this
matter.1 (See id.) As such, this case has been voluntarily dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

20
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The Court therefore DIRECTS the Clerk to close
21
this case.
22
23 IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
27
28

Dated:

May 16, 2017

/s/

Sheila K. Oberto

.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1

The Stipulation is not signed by a Defendant named in Plaintiff’s first complaint―Raythel Fisher Jr. (See Doc. 84.)
However, this complaint is no longer operative, as Plaintiff subsequently filed his First Amended Complaint for
Damages for Willful Violations of Civil Rights. (See Doc. 65.) Additionally, Mr. Fisher was not named as a
Defendant in the currently operative amended complaint. (See id.) As such, Mr. Fisher is no longer a party in this
action and his omission from the Stipulation does not preclude the voluntary dismissal of this case.