Medina v. National Oilwell Varco, L.P.

Filing 30

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/1/2015. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/29/2016 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Jury Trial set for 11/14/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JORGE MEDINA,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 1:15-CV-00235-KJM-JLT

v.

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO, L.P., et al,

15

ORDER

Defendants,

16
17
An initial scheduling conference was held in this case on July 1, 2015. John Migliazzo

18
19

appeared for Plaintiff; Guillermo Tello appeared for Defendant.
Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Status Report filed on June 2, 2015, and discussed a

20
21

schedule for the case with counsel at the hearing, the Court makes the following orders:

22

I.

SERVICE OF PROCESS
All named defendants have been served and no further service is permitted without leave

23
24

of court, good cause having been shown.

25

II.

26

ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or

27

motion to amend, no later than November 13, 2015. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b); Johnson v.

28

Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992).
1

1

III.

2

JURISDICTION/VENUE
Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332, 1441, and 1446. (Doc. 1 at 2)

3

Jurisdiction and venue are not disputed.

4

IV.

5

DISCOVERY
Initial disclosures as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) shall be completed

6

by July 10, 2015. All non-expert discovery shall be completed by February 1, 2016, and all

7

expert discovery shall be completed by April 6, 2016.
In this context, “completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all

8
9

depositions have been taken and any disputes relative to discovery shall have been resolved by

10

appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has been obeyed.

11

All motions to compel discovery must be noticed on the magistrate judge’s calendar in

12

accordance with the local rules of this court. While the assigned magistrate judge reviews

13

proposed discovery phase protective orders, requests to seal or redact are decided by Judge

14

Mueller as discussed in more detail below. In addition, while the assigned magistrate judge

15

handles discovery motions, the magistrate judge cannot change the schedule set in this order, even

16

in connection with a discovery matter.

17

V.

DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES

18

All counsel are to designate in writing, file with the court, and serve upon all other parties

19

the name, address, and area of expertise of each expert that they propose to tender at trial not later

20

than February 15, 2016. The designation shall be accompanied by a written report prepared and

21

signed by the witness. The report shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B). By March 7,

22

2016, any party who previously disclosed expert witnesses may submit a supplemental list of

23

expert witnesses who will express an opinion on a subject covered by an expert designated by an

24

adverse party, if the party supplementing an expert witness designation has not previously

25

retained an expert to testify on that subject. The supplemental designation shall be accompanied

26

by a written report, which shall also comply with the conditions stated above.

27

Failure of a party to comply with the disclosure schedule as set forth above in all

28

likelihood will preclude that party from calling the expert witness at the time of trial. An expert
2

1

witness not appearing on the designation will not be permitted to testify unless the party offering

2

the witness demonstrates: (a) that the necessity for the witness could not have been reasonably

3

anticipated at the time the list was proffered; (b) that the court and opposing counsel were

4

promptly notified upon discovery of the witness; and (c) that the witness was promptly made

5

available for deposition.
For purposes of this scheduling order, an “expert” is any person who may be used at trial

6
7

to present evidence under Rules 702, 703 and 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which

8

include both “percipient experts” (persons who, because of their expertise, have rendered expert

9

opinions in the normal course of their work duties or observations pertinent to the issues in the

10

case) and “retained experts” (persons specifically designated by a party to be a testifying expert

11

for the purposes of litigation). A party shall identify whether a disclosed expert is percipient,

12

retained, or both. It will be assumed that a party designating a retained expert has acquired the

13

express permission of the witness to be so listed. Parties designating percipient experts must state

14

in the designation who is responsible for arranging the deposition of such persons.

15

All experts designated are to be fully prepared at the time of designation to render an

16

informed opinion, and give the bases for their opinion, so that they will be able to give full and

17

complete testimony at any deposition taken by the opposing party. Experts will not be permitted

18

to testify at trial as to any information gathered or evaluated, or opinion formed, after deposition

19

taken subsequent to designation. All expert discovery shall be completed by April 6, 2016.

20

VI.

21

MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE
All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders or

22

other emergency applications, shall be filed no later than May 17, 2016 and heard no later than

23

July 1, 2016.1 The parties may obtain available hearing dates by checking Judge Mueller’s page

24

on the Court’s website.

25
26

All purely legal issues are to be resolved by timely pretrial motions. Local Rule 230
governs the calendaring and procedures of civil motions; the following provisions also apply:

27
28

1

Note that this date may not correspond to a law and motion calendar date.
3

1

(a)

The opposition and reply must be filed by 4:00 p.m. on the day due; and

2

(b)

When the last day for filing an opposition brief falls on a legal holiday, the

3

opposition brief shall be filed on the last court day immediately preceding the legal holiday.

4

Failure to comply with Local Rule 230(c), as modified by this order, may be deemed consent to

5

the motion and the court may dispose of the motion summarily. Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651,

6

652-53 (9th Cir. 1994).

7

The court places a page limit of twenty (20) pages on all moving papers, twenty (20)

8

pages on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies. All requests for page limit increases must be

9

made through the courtroom deputy clerk at least fourteen (14) days prior to the filing of the

10
11

motion.
Prior to filing a motion in a case in which the parties are represented by counsel, counsel

12

shall engage in a pre-filing meet and confer to discuss thoroughly the substance of the

13

contemplated motion and any potential resolution. Plaintiff’s counsel should carefully evaluate

14

the defendant’s contentions as to deficiencies in the complaint and in many instances the party

15

considering a motion should agree to any amendment that would cure a curable defect. Counsel

16

should discuss the issues sufficiently so that if a motion of any kind is filed, including for

17

summary judgment, the briefing is directed only to those substantive issues requiring resolution

18

by the court. Counsel should resolve minor procedural or other non-substantive matters during

19

the meet and confer. A notice of motion shall contain a certification by counsel filing the

20

motion that meet and confer efforts have been exhausted, with a brief summary of meet and

21

confer efforts.

22

The parties are reminded that a motion in limine is a pretrial procedural device designed to

23

address the admissibility of evidence. The court looks with disfavor upon dispositional motions

24

presented at the Final Pretrial Conference or at trial in the guise of motions in limine. Although

25

all motions in limine must be filed in conjunction with the joint pretrial statement, the court will

26

hear only those motions it has identified to counsel before the hearing date.

27
28

The parties are cautioned that failure to raise a dispositive legal issue that could have been
tendered to the court by proper pretrial motion prior to the dispositive motion cut-off date may
4

1

constitute waiver of such issue.

2

VII.

3

SEALING
No document will be sealed, nor shall a redacted document be filed, without the prior

4

approval of the court. If a document for which sealing or redaction is sought relates to the record

5

on a motion to be decided by Judge Mueller, the request to seal or redact should be directed to her

6

and not the assigned Magistrate Judge. All requests to seal or redact shall be governed by Local

7

Rules 141 (sealing) and 140 (redaction); protective orders covering the discovery phase of

8

litigation shall not govern the filing of sealed or redacted documents on the public docket. The

9

court will only consider requests to seal or redact filed by the proponent of sealing or redaction.

10

If a party plans to make a filing that includes material an opposing party has identified as

11

confidential and potentially subject to sealing, the filing party shall provide the opposing party

12

with sufficient notice in advance of filing to allow for the seeking of an order of sealing or

13

redaction from the court.

14

VIII.

15

FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
The Final Pretrial Conference is set for September 29, 2016, at 3:30 p.m. At least one of

16

the attorneys who will conduct the trial for each of the parties shall attend the Final Pretrial

17

Conference. If by reason of illness or other unavoidable circumstance a trial attorney is unable to

18

attend, the attorney who attends in place of the trial attorney shall have equal familiarity with the

19

case and equal authorization to make commitments on behalf of the client.

20

Counsel for all parties are to be fully prepared for trial at the time of the Final Pretrial

21

Conference, with no matters remaining to be accomplished except production of witnesses for

22

oral testimony. The parties shall confer and file a joint pretrial conference statement by August

23

26, 2016. The provisions of Local Rule 281 shall apply with respect to the matters to be included

24

in the joint pretrial statement. In addition to those subjects listed in Local Rule 281(b), the parties

25

are to provide the court with the following:

26
27
28

- A plain, concise statement that identifies every non-discovery motion previously
tendered to the court and its resolution.
- A concise, joint list of undisputed core facts that are relevant to each claim. Disputed
5

1

core facts should then be identified in the same manner. The parties are reminded not to identify

2

every fact in dispute but only those disputed facts that are essential to the formulation of each

3

claim. Each disputed fact and undisputed fact should be separately numbered or lettered. Where

4

the parties are unable to agree on the core disputed facts, they should nevertheless list core

5

disputed facts in the above manner.
- Concise lists of disputed evidentiary issues that will be the subject of a party’s motion in

6
7
8
9

limine.
- Each party’s points of law, which concisely describe the legal basis or theory underlying
their claims and defenses. Points of law should reflect issues derived from the core undisputed

10

and disputed facts. Parties shall not include argument with any point of law; the parties may

11

include concise arguments in their trial briefs.

12

- A joint statement of the case in plain concise language, which will be read to the jury

13

during voir dire and at the beginning of the trial. The purpose of the joint statement is to inform

14

the jury what the case is about.

15

- The parties’ position on the number of jurors to be impaneled to try the case.

16

Discovery documents to be listed in the pretrial statement shall not include documents to

17
18

be used only for impeachment and in rebuttal.
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Local Rule 281 they are required to attach to the

19

Final Pretrial Conference Statement an exhibit listing witnesses and exhibits they propose to

20

offer at trial. After the name of each witness, each party shall provide a brief statement of the

21

nature of the testimony to be proffered. The parties may file a joint list or each party may file

22

separate lists. These list(s) shall not be contained in the body of the Final Pretrial Conference

23

Statement itself, but shall be attached as separate documents to be used as addenda to the Final

24

Pretrial Order.

25

Plaintiff’s exhibits shall be listed numerically. Defendant’s exhibits shall be listed

26

alphabetically. The parties shall use the standard exhibit stickers provided by the court: pink for

27

plaintiff and blue for defendant. In the event that the alphabet is exhausted, the exhibits shall be

28

marked “AA-ZZ”. However, if the amount of defendant exhibits exceeds "ZZ" exhibits shall be
6

1

then listed as A-3, A-4, A-5 etc. All multi page exhibits shall be stapled or otherwise fastened

2

together and each page within the exhibit shall be numbered. The list of exhibits shall not include

3

excerpts of depositions to be used only for impeachment. In the event that plaintiff(s) and

4

defendant(s) offer the same exhibit during trial, that exhibit shall be referred to by the designation

5

the exhibit is first identified. The court cautions the parties to pay attention to this detail so that

6

all concerned, including the jury, will not be confused by one exhibit being identified with both a

7

number and a letter. The parties are encouraged to consult concerning exhibits and, to the extent

8

possible, provide joint exhibits, which shall be designated as JX and listed numerically, e.g., JX-

9

1, JX-2.

10

The Final Pretrial Order will contain a stringent standard for the offering at trial of

11

witnesses and exhibits not listed in the Final Pretrial Order, and the parties are cautioned that the

12

standard will be strictly applied. On the other hand, the listing of exhibits or witnesses that a

13

party does not intend to offer will be viewed as an abuse of the court’s processes.

14
15

Counsel shall produce all trial exhibits to Casey Schultz, the Courtroom Deputy, no later
than 3:00 p.m. on the Friday before trial.

16
17

Failure to comply with Local Rule 281, as modified by this order, may be grounds for
sanctions.

18

The parties also are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil

19

Procedure it will be their duty at the Final Pretrial Conference to aid the court in: (a) the

20

formulation and simplification of issues and the elimination of frivolous claims or defenses; (b)

21

the settling of facts that should properly be admitted; and (c) the avoidance of unnecessary proof

22

and cumulative evidence. Counsel must cooperatively prepare the joint Final Pretrial Conference

23

Statement and participate in good faith at the Final Pretrial Conference with these aims in mind.2

24

A failure to do so may result in the imposition of sanctions which may include monetary

25

sanctions, orders precluding proof, elimination of claims or defenses, or such other sanctions as

26

2

27
28

“If the pretrial conference discloses that no material facts are in dispute and that the undisputed
facts entitle one of the parties to judgment as a matter of law,” the court may summarily dispose
of the case or claims. Portsmouth Square v. Shareholders Protective Comm., 770 F.2d 866, 86869 (9th Cir. 1985).
7

1

the court deems appropriate.

2

Concurrently with the filing of the Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement, counsel shall

3

submit to chambers the word processor version of the Statement, in its entirety (including the

4

witness and exhibit lists) to: [e-mail].

5

IX.

6

TRIAL SETTING
The trial is set for November 14, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. The parties estimate a trial length of

7

approximately 5-7 days. Trial briefs are due by November 1, 2016.

8

X.

9

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
No settlement conference is currently scheduled. A settlement conference may be set at

10

the time of the Final Pretrial Conference or at an earlier time at the parties’ request. In the event

11

that an earlier settlement conference date or referral to the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program

12

(VDRP) is requested, the parties shall file said request jointly, in writing. Because the case will

13

be tried to a jury, all parties should be prepared to advise the court whether they will stipulate to

14

the trial judge acting as settlement judge and waive disqualification by virtue thereof.

15

Counsel are instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority present at any

16

Settlement Conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. Each judge has

17

different requirements for the submission of settlement conference statements; the appropriate

18

instructions will be sent to you after the settlement judge is assigned.

19

XI.

MODIFICATION OF STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER

20

The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil

21

Procedure, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order shall not be modified except by leave of court

22

upon a showing of good cause. Agreement by the parties pursuant to stipulation alone does not

23

constitute good cause. Except in extraordinary circumstances, unavailability of witnesses or

24

counsel does not constitute good cause.

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
8

1
2
3

XII.

OBJECTIONS TO STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
This Status Order will become final without further order of the court unless objections

are filed within fourteen (14) calendar days of service of this Order.

4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

July 1, 2015

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9