Medina v. National Oilwell Varco, L.P.
ORDER CLOSING CASE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/24/2017. CASE CLOSED. (Hall, S)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JORGE MEDINA, an individual
Case No. 1:15-CV-00235-DAD-JLT
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF
ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
DNOW, L.P. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive (Doc. 49)
On February 23, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation dismissing the action and agreeing that
each side will bear their own costs. (Doc. 49) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 provides
that “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: . . . a stipulation of
dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.”. . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Once such a notice
has been filed, an order of the Court is not required to make the dismissal effective. Fed. R. Civ. P.
41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk
of Court is DIRECTED to close this action in light of the notice of dismissal with prejudice filed
and properly signed pursuant to Rule 41(a).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
February 24, 2017
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?