Perez v. CSS

Filing 7

ORDER Directing Clerk to Issue Summons and Social Security Case Documents; ORDER Directing United States Marshall for Service of the First Amended Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 03/05/2015. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MOLLIE CHRISTINE PEREZ,
Plaintiff,

12
v.

13
14
15

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:15-cv-00236- JLT
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ISSUE
SUMMONS AND SOCIAL SECURITY CASE
DOCUMENTS
ORDER DIRECTING UNITED STATES
MARSHAL FOR SERVICE OF THE FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. 6)

17
Plaintiff Mollie Christine Perez is proceeding in forma pauperis with an action for judicial

18
19

review of a decision of the Social Security Administration to deny her application for benefits. On

20

April 2, 2014, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (Doc. 6). For the following reasons, the

21

Court finds service of the First Amended Complaint is appropriate.

22

I.

23

Screening Requirement
When a plaintiff proceeds in forma pauperis, the Court is required to review the complaint, and

24

shall dismiss the case at any time if the Court determines that the action is “frivolous, malicious or

25

fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or . . . seeks monetary relief against a defendant

26

who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). The Court must screen the First Amended

27

Complaint because an amended complaint supersedes the previously filed complaint. See Forsyth v.

28

Humana, Inc., 114 F.3d 1467, 1474 (9th Cir. 1997); King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987).
1

1

II.

Pleading Standards

2

General rules for pleading complaints are governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A

3

pleading must include a statement affirming the court’s jurisdiction, “a short and plain statement of the

4

claim showing the pleader is entitled to relief; and . . . a demand for the relief sought, which may

5

include relief in the alternative or different types of relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a).
A complaint must give fair notice and state the elements of the plaintiff’s claim in a plain and

6
7

succinct manner. Jones v. Cmty Redevelopment Agency, 733 F.2d 646, 649 (9th Cir. 1984). The

8

purpose of the complaint is to give a defendant fair notice of the claims against him, and the grounds

9

upon which the action stands. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A., 534 U.S. 506, 512 (2002). The Supreme

10

Court noted: “A pleading that offers labels and conclusions or a formulaic recitation of the elements of

11

a cause of action will not do. Nor does a complaint suffice if it tenders naked assertions devoid of

12

further factual enhancement.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 677 (2009) (internal quotation marks,

13

citations omitted). Conclusory and vague allegations do not support a cause of action. Ivey v. Board of

14

Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir. 1982). When factual allegations are well-pled, a court should

15

assume their truth and determine whether the facts would make the plaintiff entitled to relief;

16

conclusions in the pleading are not entitled to the same assumption of truth. Id.

17

III.

18

Discussion and Analysis
Plaintiff seeks review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying disability

19

benefits. (Doc. 6.) The Court may have jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), which provides

20

in relevant part:

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Any individual, after any final decision of the Commissioner made after a hearing to
which he was a party, irrespective of the amount in controversy, may obtain a review of
such decision by a civil action commenced within sixty days after the mailing to him
of such decision or within such further time as the Commissioner may allow. Such
action shall be brought in the district court of the United States for the judicial district
in which the plaintiff resides, or has his principal place of business . . . The court shall
have power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment
affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security,
with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.
Id. (emphasis added). Except as provided, “[n]o findings of fact or decision of the Commissioner shall
be reviewed by any person, tribunal, or governmental agency.” 42 U.S.C. § 405(h). These regulations

28
2

1

“operate as a statute of limitations setting the time period in which a claimant may appeal a final

2

decision of the Commissioner.” Cogburn v. Astrue, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152351, at * 5 (E.D. Cal.

3

Oct. 29, 2010) (citing Bowen v. City of New York, 476 U.S. 467, 479 (1986); Vernon v. Heckler, 811

4

F.2d 1274, 1277 (9th Cir.1987)). The time limit is a condition on the waiver of sovereign immunity,

5

and it must be strictly construed. Id.
According to Plaintiff, the Appeals Council denied her request for review of the decision

6
7

rendered by an administrative law judge on December 12, 2015. (Doc. 6 at 2.) Therefore, Plaintiff’s

8

request for judicial review of the decision is timely, and the Court has jurisdiction over the complaint

9

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

10
11
12

IV.

Conclusion and Order
Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint states a cognizable claim for judicial review of the

decision denying the request for Social Security benefits.

13

Based upon the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

14

1.

Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security;

15
16

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to issue summons as to the defendant, Carolyn

2.

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to issue and serve Plaintiff with Social Security Case

17

Documents, including the Scheduling Order, Order regarding Consent, the Consent

18

Form, and USM-285 Forms;

19

3.

Documents in Social Security Appeal Form;” and

20
21

Plaintiff SHALL complete and submit to the Court the “Notice of Submission of

4.

The U.S. Marshal is DIRECTED to serve a copy of the First Amended Complaint

22

(Doc. 6), summons, and this order upon the defendant as directed by Plaintiff in the

23

USM Forms.

24
25
26
27

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

March 5, 2015

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28
3