A.V. v. Panama Buena Vista Union School District

Filing 4

ORDER GRANTING 1 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; ORDER to Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE Why the Action Should Not Be Dismissed, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/24/2015. Show Cause Response due within 21 days. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 A.V., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL ) ) DISTRICT, ) ) Defendant. ) Case No.: 1:15-cv-00246 - --- - JLT ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 17 Plaintiff A.V. initiated this action by filing a complaint and motion to proceed in forma 18 pauperis. (Docs. 1-2.) The Court may authorize the commencement of an action without prepayment 19 of fees “but a person who submits an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets such person . . . 20 possesses [and] that the person is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor.” 28 U.S.C. § 21 1915(a). The Court has reviewed the motion and finds Plaintiff satisfies the requirements of 28 U.S.C. 22 § 1915(a). 23 Importantly, however, Plaintiff is a child. The capacity of a litigant is determined by “the law 24 of the state where the court is located.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(b). Under California law, a child “shall 25 appear either by a guardian or conservator of the estate or by a guardian ad litem appointed by the 26 court in which the action or proceeding is pending, or by the judge in each case.” Cal. Code of Civ. P. 27 § 372. Consequently, a child cannot maintain an action on his own, but may appear as a litigant if 28 represented by a guardian ad litem. Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c). The Local Rules instruct: 1 1 2 3 Upon commencement of an action or upon initial appearance in defense of an action by or on behalf of a minor . . . the attorney representing the minor…shall present (1) appropriate evidence of a representative for the minor or incompetent person under state law or (2) a motion for the appointment of a guardian ad litem by the Court. 4 Local Rule 202(a). Here, although Concepcion Varela is identified as Plaintiff’s guardian ad litem in 5 the caption of the complaint, it is unclear whether she was previously appointed as his guardian ad 6 litem. Further, no motion has been filed with the court for the appointment of a guardian. Thus, it 7 appears Plaintiff lacks the capacity to prosecute this action. 8 Based upon for the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 9 1. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED; and 10 2. Plaintiff SHALL show cause within twenty-one days why the action should not be 11 dismissed for a lack of capacity to sue or, in the alternative, to file a petition for the 12 appointment of a guardian ad litem. 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 24, 2015 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?