Lobato v. Vang et al

Filing 22

Stipulation For DISMISSAL Of Action ORDER, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/1/2015. CASE CLOSED.(Fahrney, E)

1
2
3
4
5

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Rachel Lobato

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

RACHEL LOBATO,

) No. 1:15-cv-00254-LJO-GSA
)
Plaintiff,
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION ORDER
)
vs.
)
CHERYL VANG dba FOOD EMPIRE, et al., )
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER
Page 1

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Rachel Lobato and Defendants

2

Cheryl Vang and Koua Vang, dba Food Empire, the parties who have appeared in this action,

3

by and through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

4

41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each

5

party is to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

6
7

Date: May 28, 2015

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

8
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff
Rachel Lobato

9
10
11
12

Date: May 28, 2015

WILD, CARTER & TIPTON, APC

13
/s/ Patrick J. Gorman
Patrick J. Gorman
Attorneys for Defendants
Cheryl Vang and Koua Vang, dba Food Empire

14
15
16

ORDER

17
18
19
20
21
22

The parties having so stipulated,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
Each party shall bear its own attorney’s fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24

Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

June 1, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
27
28

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION; ORDER
Page 2