Murillo v. Holland et al

Filing 161

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sean C. Riordan on 10/29/2024 DENYING the 159 Motions to Appoint Counsel and a Settlement Conference without prejudice to their renewal, if appropriate, after the district judge has ruled on Defendant's 147 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Spichka, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

JOAQUIN MURILLO,

10

Plaintiff,

11
12

No. 1:15-cv-0266 DC SCR P

v.

ORDER

K. HOLLAND, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14
15

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action, has requested

16

appointment of counsel and a settlement conference. Plaintiff filed similar motions in August.

17

(ECF No. 157.) The court denied those motions as premature. (ECF No. 160.) For the same

18

reasons,

19

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions for the appointment of counsel and a

20

settlement conference (ECF No. 159) are denied without prejudice to their renewal, if

21

appropriate, after the district judge has ruled on defendants’ motion for summary judgment.

22

DATED: October 29, 2024

23
24
25
26
27
28