Murillo v. Holland et al
Filing
22
ORDER Disregarding Plaintiff's Motion for Court Order and Notice re Copies for Submission Documents 20 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/1/15. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
JOAQUIN MURILLO,
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
Case No. 1:15-cv-00266-JLT (PC)
ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION FOR COURT ORDER AND
NOTICE RE COPIES FOR SUBMSSION
DOCUMENTS
HOLLAND, et al
(Doc. 20)
Defendants.
15
16
Plaintiff. Joaquin Murillo, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in
17
18
19
20
this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on February 20, 2015.
(Doc. 1.) The Court screened Plaintiff=s Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915A, found that it
stated cognizable claims, and that service was appropriate.
On June 10, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion indicating that prison staff were thwarting his
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
efforts to provide the requisite copies of documents for service. (Doc. 20.) However, summonses
have already issued and, along with the requisite copies of the Complaint, have been forwarded to
the United States Marshall's office for service. (See Docs. 16-19.)
///
///
///
///
1
1
2
Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for court order and notice re copies of submission
documents, filed on June 10, 2015 (Doc. 20), is HEREBY DISREGARDED as moot.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 1, 2015
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?