Bishop v. Lopez, et al.

Filing 111

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION and DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief 95 , 101 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/14/16. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

ROBERT BISHOP,

9

Plaintiff,

10
11

v.
RAUL LOPEZ, et al.,

12

Defendants.

13

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:15-cv-00273-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF
[ECF Nos. 95, 101]

14
Plaintiff Robert Bishop is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

15
16

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

17

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

18

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 25, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

19

Recommendation which was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that

20

objections to the Findings and Recommendation were to be filed within thirty days. The thirty day

21

time frame has expired and no objections were filed.

22

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

23

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

24

Recommendation to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The Findings and Recommendation, filed on November 25, 2015, is adopted in full;

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief, filed October 23, 2015, is DENIED.

3
4

and

5
6
7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

March 14, 2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2