Bishop v. Lopez, et al.

Filing 130

ORDER ADOPTING 113 Findings and Recommendation, Denying Plaintiff's 112 Motion for a Court Order Granting Access to the Law Library and Legal Materials, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/13/16. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

ROBERT BISHOP,

9

Plaintiff,

10
11

v.
RAUL LOPEZ, et al.,

12

Defendants.

13

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:15-cv-00273-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR A COURT ORDER GRANTING
ACCESS TO THE LAW LIBRARY AND LEGAL
MATERIALS
[ECF Nos. 112 & 113]

14
Plaintiff Robert Bishop is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

15
16

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

17

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

18

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 22, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

19

Recommendation which was served on the parties and contained notice objections to the Findings and

20

Recommendation were to be filed within thirty days. The thirty day time frame has expired and no

21

objections were filed.

22

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

23

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

24

Recommendation to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The Findings and Recommendation, filed on March 22, 2016, is adopted in full; and

3

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief, filed March 18, 2016, is DENIED.

4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____

June 13, 2016

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2