Hernandez v. Wofford et al

Filing 12

FINDINGS And RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Dismissal Of Action For Failure To Obey A Court Order And Failure To State A Claim (ECF No. 11 ), Fourteen-Day Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/11/2015. F&R's referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii; Objections to F&R due by 6/30/2015. (Fahrney, E)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9

HENRY AQUAYO HERNANDEZ,

10
11
12
13

Plaintiff,
v.
WOFFORD, et al.,
Defendants.

14
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:15-cv-00274-AWI-BAM (PC)
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION
FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT
ORDER AND FAILURE TO STATE A
CLAIM
(ECF No. 11)
FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

16
17
18
19

Plaintiff Henry Aquayo Hernandez (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro
se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On May 5, 2015, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend within

20

thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Plaintiff was warned that if he failed to file an amended

21

complaint in compliance with the order, this action would be dismissed for failure to obey a

22

court order and failure to state a claim. (ECF No. 11.) More than thirty days have passed, and

23

Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

24

The deadline for Plaintiff to file his amended complaint has passed and Plaintiff has not

25

complied with or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. As a result, there is no pleading on

26

file which sets forth any claims upon which relief may be granted.

27
28
1

1

Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), IT IS HEREBY

2

RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed based on Plaintiff’s failure to obey a court order

3

and failure to state a claim.

4

These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District

5

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

6

fourteen (14) days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may

7

file written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to

8

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

9

objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of the “right to challenge the

10

magistrate’s factual findings” on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir.

11

2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)).

12
13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Barbara

June 11, 2015

15

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2