Martinez v. Schwarzenegger

Filing 7

ORDER REGARDING Plaintiff's 6 Letter signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 3/16/2015. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD LORENZO MARTINEZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 Case No. 1:15-cv-00281-DLB PC ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S LETTER v. (Document 6) 14 ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Richard Lorenzo Martinez (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro 18 se in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on February 23, 2015. 19 On February 26, 2015, the Court ordered Plaintiff to submit an application to proceed in forma 20 pauperis on the correct form, or pay the filing fee, within 45 days. On March 13, 2015, the Court received a letter from Plaintiff inquiring as to whether he 21 22 needed to pay the filing fee for this action. He states that this is the same complaint that was filed in 23 1:14-cv-01393-LJO-SAB, for which he is already paying the filing fee. 24 Plaintiff’s prior action was dismissed on January 7, 2015, for failure to exhaust his 25 administrative remedies. It appears that Plaintiff filed this action after he fully exhausted. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Plaintiff is informed that there are no exceptions to paying the filing fee, even where a prior 2 action was dismissed as unexhausted. Plaintiff SHALL comply with the February 26, 2015, order 3 within the required time frame. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Dennis March 16, 2015 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?