Martinez v. Schwarzenegger

Filing 8

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Follow Court Order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 4/21/2015. Show Cause Response due within twenty-one (21) days. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD LORENZO MARTINEZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., 15 Case No. 1:15-cv-00281-DLB PC ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO FOLLOW COURT ORDER TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Richard Lorenzo Martinez (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro 18 se in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on February 23, 2015. 19 On February 26, 2015, the Court ordered Plaintiff to submit an application to proceed in forma 20 pauperis on the correct form, or pay the filing fee, within forty-five (45) days. 21 Over forty-five (45) days have passed and Plaintiff has not complied with the order.1 22 Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, if any he has, why this action 23 should not be dismissed for failure to follow a Court order. Plaintiff must file a response within 24 twenty-one (21) days of the date of service of this order. Plaintiff may also comply by filing an 25 application to proceed in forma pauperis or paying the filing fee, as required by the February 26, 26 2015, order. 27 28 1 On March 13, 2015, Plaintiff sent a letter to the Court questioning the filing fee. In a March 16, 2015, order, the Court informed Plaintiff that the filing fee was required and that he had to comply with the February 26, 2015, within the timeframe provided. 1 1 Failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of this action. 2 3 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Dennis April 21, 2015 L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?