Martinez v. Schwarzenegger
Filing
8
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Follow Court Order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 4/21/2015. Show Cause Response due within twenty-one (21) days. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RICHARD LORENZO MARTINEZ,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,
15
Case No. 1:15-cv-00281-DLB PC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO FOLLOW COURT ORDER
TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff Richard Lorenzo Martinez (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro
18
se in this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on February 23, 2015.
19
On February 26, 2015, the Court ordered Plaintiff to submit an application to proceed in forma
20
pauperis on the correct form, or pay the filing fee, within forty-five (45) days.
21
Over forty-five (45) days have passed and Plaintiff has not complied with the order.1
22
Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, if any he has, why this action
23
should not be dismissed for failure to follow a Court order. Plaintiff must file a response within
24
twenty-one (21) days of the date of service of this order. Plaintiff may also comply by filing an
25
application to proceed in forma pauperis or paying the filing fee, as required by the February 26,
26
2015, order.
27
28
1
On March 13, 2015, Plaintiff sent a letter to the Court questioning the filing fee. In a March 16, 2015, order, the Court
informed Plaintiff that the filing fee was required and that he had to comply with the February 26, 2015, within the timeframe provided.
1
1
Failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of this action.
2
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
April 21, 2015
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?