Moore v. Taylor, et al.

Filing 11

STIPULATION to Extend Time for J&D Properties to Respond to Complaint and Continue the Scheduling Conference; ORDER - (1) Defendant J&D Properties shall have to and including June 1, 2015 within which to respond to Plaintiffs complaint. (2) The Initial Scheduling Conference set for May 19, 2015, is continued to Monday, July 20, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. before Judge McAuliffe in Courtroom 8 (BAM). signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/30/2015. (Herman, H)

Download PDF
1 DANIEL W. ROWLEY, #109408 drowley@gmlegal.net 2 GILMORE MAGNESS LEIFER P.O. Box 28907 3 Fresno, CA 93729-8907 Telephone: (559) 448-9800 4 Facsimile: (559) 448-9899 5 Attorneys for Defendants, J&D Properties, a California General Partnership 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO DIVISION 10 11 RONALD MOORE, Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 JASON TAYLOR dba TAYLOR REPTILE, J&D PROPERTIES, a 15 California general Partnership, CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00300-AWI-BAM STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR J&D PROPERTIES TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND CONTINUE THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER Defendants. 16 17 18 WHEREAS, the Complaint contains allegations of violations of the 19 20 Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and related causes of action; WHEREAS, the parties are attempting to resolve this matter without further 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GILMORE MAGNESS LEIFER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION P.O. BOX 28907 FRESNO, CA 93729-8907 litigation; WHEREAS, the parties have previously stipulated, and the Court Ordered, that Defendant J&D Properties (“Defendant”) shall have until May 1, 2015, to answer or otherwise respond to the Plaintiff’s complaint so that Defendant could obtain a CASp inspection of the real property at issue in this case (the “Property”) and, if necessary, bids to correct things that are actually not in compliance with the ADA; 10926-0\00317156.000 1:15-CV-00300-AWI-BAM STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR J&D PROPERTIES TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND CONTINUE THE INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 WHEREAS, as of April 28, 2014, the report for the CASp inspection has not 2 yet been completed and, therefore, Defendant has not had the opportunity to obtain bids, if 3 necessary, for the work to bring the Property into compliance with the ADA; 4 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that Defendant may have until June 1, 5 2015, to answer or otherwise respond to the Plaintiff’s complaint; 6 WHEREAS , additional time is also needed to engage in and, hopefully, 7 complete settlement discussions; and 8 WHEREAS, the Initial Scheduling Conference is set for May 19, 2015, and 9 will need to be continued in order to allow the parties the opportunity to resolve the case 10 without further litigation, 11 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their 12 respective attorneys of record as follows: 13 1. Defendant shall have until June 1, 2015, to answer or otherwise 14 respond to the Plaintiff’s complaint. 15 2. The Initial Scheduling Conference be continued to a date at the 16 Court’s convenience after June 29, 2015. 17 DATED: April 28, 2015 GILMORE MAGNESS LEIFER 18 19 By: 20 21 s/s Daniel W. Rowley Daniel W. Rowley Attorneys for Defendants, J&D Properties, a California general Partnership 22 DATED: March 24, 2015 MOORE LAW FIRM 23 24 25 26 By: s/s Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorneys for Plaintiff, Ronald Moore 27 28 GILMORE MAGNESS LEIFER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION P.O. BOX 28907 FRESNO, CA 93729-8907 ORDER 1 The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing, 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. Defendant J&D Properties shall have to and including June 1, 2015 4 within which to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint. 5 2. The Initial Scheduling Conference set for May 19, 2015, is continued 6 to Monday, July 20, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. before Judge McAuliffe. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GILMORE MAGNESS LEIFER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION P.O. BOX 28907 FRESNO, CA 93729-8907 April 30, 2015 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?