Athwal et al v. County of Stanislaus et al
Filing
167
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/26/2021 CONTINUING The deadline to 11/18/2021 to file Amended Complaint. The Defendants' responsive pleading shall be filed no later than 30 days after service of the Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ARTURO J. GONZALEZ (CA SBN 121490)
AGonzalez@mofo.com
JESSICA L. GRANT (CA SBN 178138)
JGrant@mofo.com
MATTHEW A. CHIVVIS (CA SBN 251325)
MChivvis@mofo.com
ROBERT S. SANDOVAL (CA SBN 311032)
RSandoval@mofo.com
MEREDITH L. ANGUEIRA (CA SBN 333222)
MAngueira@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: 415.268.7000
Facsimile: 415.268.7522
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
BALJIT ATHWAL and DALJIT ATWAL
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
BALJIT ATHWAL; DALJIT ATWAL,
Plaintiffs,
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
v.
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS; CITY OF
TURLOCK; CITY OF MODESTO; CITY OF
CERES; STANISLAUS COUNTY OFFICE OF
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY; KIRK BUNCH;
JON EVERS; TIMOTHY REDD; DALE
LINGERFELT; STEVE JACOBSON; BIRGIT
FLADAGER; GALEN CARROLL,
Case No. 1:15-cv-00311-TLN-BAM
(The Hon. Troy L. Nunley)
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
TO CONTINUE AMENDED
COMPLAINT FILING DATE
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. AND ORDER TO CONTINUE AMENDED COMPLAINT FILING DATE
CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00311-TLN-BAM
sf-4601488
1
Plaintiffs BALJIT ATHWAL and DALJIT ATWAL (“Plaintiffs”); and defendants
2 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS; CITY OF MODESTO; CITY OF TURLOCK; CITY OF CERES;
3 STANISLAUS COUNTY OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY; BIRGIT FLADAGER;
4 KIRK BUNCH; STEVE JACOBSON; JON EVERS; TIMOTHY REDD; DALE LINGERFELT;
5 and GALEN CARROL (“Defendants”) through their respective counsel, hereby agree and
6 stipulate as follows:
7
1.
WHEREAS on September 29, 2021, the Honorable Judge Nunley dismissed
8 plaintiffs’ complaints with leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days;
9
2.
WHEREAS Plaintiffs’ amended complaint is presently due for filing on October
10 28, 2021;
11
3.
WHEREAS the Honorable Judge Nunley issued the order to dismiss with leave to
12 amend while counsel for Plaintiffs CARSON, the DEFILIPPOES and QUINTANAR were
13 engaged in a month-long trial;
14
4.
WHEREAS Jayme L. Walker, the lead attorney for Plaintiffs CARSON; the
15 DEFILIPPOES; and QUINTANAR, is currently on maternity leave;
16
5.
WHEREAS Plaintiffs’ law firm has a conflicting filing deadline pertaining to a
17 writ of mandamus in another action;
18
6.
All parties agree that the deadline for filing the Amended Complaint be continued
19 to November 18, 2021;
20
7.
Defendants’ responsive pleading shall be filed no later than 30 days after service
21
of the plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint.
22 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
23
24
25
26
27
DATE: October 26, 2021
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
/s/ Arturo Gonzalez
Arturo Gonzalez
Attorney for Plaintiffs
BALJIT ATHWAL, DALJIT ATWAL,
WALTER WELLS AND SCOTT MCFARLANE
28
1
STIP. AND ORDER TO CONTINUE AMENDED COMPLAINT FILING DATE
CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00311-TLN-BAM
sf-4601488
1 DATE: October 26, 2021
2
PORTER SCOTT
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
/s/ John R. Whitefleet *
John R. Whitefleet
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, STANISLAUS
COUNTY OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT
ATTORNEY, BIRGIT FLADAGER, KIRK BUNCH,
STEVE JACOBSON, DALE LINGERFELT
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
DATE: October 26, 2021
10
ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP
/s/ Patrick Moriarty *
John B. Robinson
Patrick Moriarty
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF MODESTO, JON EVERS, AND GALEN
CARROLL
11
12
13
14
15
16 DATE: October 26, 2021
ARATA SWINGLE VAN EGMOND & HEITLINGER
17
18
19
20
/s/ Bradley J. Swingle *
Bradley J. Swingle
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF TURLOCK, CITY OF CERES, AND
TIMOTHY REDD
,
21
22
23
* Parties have consented to use of their electronic signature.
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIP. AND ORDER TO CONTINUE AMENDED COMPLAINT FILING DATE
CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00311-TLN-BAM
sf-4601488
ORDER
1
2 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties:
3
1.
The deadline for Plaintiffs to file an Amended Complaint is continued to
4 November 18, 2021.
5
2.
The Defendants’ responsive pleading shall be filed no later than 30 days after
6 service of the plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint.
7
8 IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
11
12
Dated: October 26, 2021
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIP. AND ORDER TO CONTINUE AMENDED COMPLAINT FILING DATE
CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00311-TLN-BAM
sf-4601488
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?