Athwal et al v. County of Stanislaus et al

Filing 176

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/1/22 CONTINUING the briefing schedule as follows: Plaintiffs' Oppositions to Defendants' FRCP12(b)(6) motions to dismiss: 4/11/22; Defendants' Replies (if any): 5/26/22; hearing date: 6/16/22, at 2 p.m.. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ (CA SBN 121490)
[e-mail]
JESSICA L. GRANT (CA SBN 178138)
[e-mail]
MATTHEW A. CHIVVIS (CA SBN 251325)
[e-mail]
ROBERT S. SANDOVAL (CA SBN 311032)
[e-mail]
MEREDITH L. ANGUEIRA (CA SBN 333222)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
BALJIT ATHWAL, DALJIT ATWAL, WALTER W. WELLS
and SCOTT McFARLANE

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

BALJIT ATHWAL and DALJIT ATWAL,

14
15
16
17
18
19

Plaintiffs,
v.
COUNTY OF STANILSAUS; CITY OF
TURLOCK; CITY OF MODESTO; CITY OF
CERES; STANISLAUS COUNTY OFFICE OF
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY; KIRK BUNCH;
JON EVERS; TIMOTHY REDD; DALE
LINGERFELT; STEVE JACOBSON; BIRGIT
FLADAGER; GALEN CARROLL;

20

Defendants.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

WALTER W. WELLS and SCOTT
MCFARLANE

Case No. 1:15-cv-00311-TLN-BAM
JOINT STIPULATION AND
ORDER TO CONTINUE
OPPOSITION AND REPLY DATES
IN CONNECTION WITH
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO
DISMISS
Hon. Troy L. Nunley
Trial: None Set
Related to:
CASE NO. 1:20-CV-00770-TLN-BAM
CASE NO. 1:20-CV-00747-TLN-BAM
CASE NO. 1:18-cv-00496-TLN-BAM
CASE NO. 1:18-cv-01403-TLN-BAM
Case No. 1:20-cv-00770-TLN-BAM

Plaintiffs,
v.
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, ET AL.
Defendants.

28
STIPULATION & ORDER TO CONTINUE OPPOSITION AND REPLY DATES IN CONNECTION WITH DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

1

FRANK CARSON,

2
3
4
5
6
7

Plaintiffs,
v.
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, CITY OF
MODESTO, CITY OF CERES, BIRGIT
FLADAGER, MARLISSA FERREIRA, DAVID
HARRIS, KIRK BUNCH, STEVE JACOBSON,
JON EVERS, CORY BROWN, and DEREK
PERRY, and DOES 1-25, inclusive,
Defendants.

8
9

GEORGIA DEFILIPPO AND CHRISTINA
DEFILIPPO

10
11
12

15
16
17

Case No. 1:18-cv-00496-TLN-BAM

Plaintiffs,
v.
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, ET AL.
Defendants.

13
14

Case No. 1:20-cv-00747-TLN-BAM

EDUARDO QUINTANAR, JR.,

Case No. 1:18-cv-01403-TLN-BAM

Plaintiffs,
v.
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, ET AL.
Defendants.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION & ORDER TO CONTINUE OPPOSITION AND REPLY DATES IN CONNECTION WITH DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
2

1

Defendants COUNTY OF STANISLAUS; CITY OF MODESTO; CITY OF TURLOCK;

2

CITY OF CERES; STANISLAUS COUNTY OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY;

3

BIRGIT FLADAGER; MARLISSA FERREIRA; DAVID HARRIS; KIRK BUNCH; STEVE

4

JACOBSON; CORY BROWN; JON EVERS; TIMOTHY REDD; DALE LINGERFELT;

5

GALEN CARROL; FROLIAN MARISCAL; LLOYD MCKINNON; GREG JONES;

6

KENNETH BARRINGER; GALEN CARROLL; FRANK NAVARRO; and TIMOTHY REDD

7

(“Defendants”) and Plaintiffs ESTATE OF FRANK CARSON; GEORGIA DEFILIPPO;

8

CHRISTINA DEFILIPPO; EDUARDO QUINTANAR, JR.; BALJIT ATHWAL; DALJIT

9

ATHWAL; WALTER WELLS; and SCOTT MCFARLANE (“Plaintiffs”) through their

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
1.

WHEREAS Plaintiffs have been served with multiple separate motions to

dismiss;
2.

WHEREAS Plaintiffs would like additional time to confer with Defendants and

possibly dismiss certain claims against certain Defendants;
3.

All parties agree that the deadline for opposing Defendants’ motions to dismiss

be continued to April 11, 2022;

17

4.

18

The stipulated briefing schedule is as follows:

19
20
21

Defendants’ reply briefs shall be filed no later than May 26, 2022.

Plaintiffs’ Oppositions to Defendants’ FRCP
12(b)(6) motions to dismiss

April 11, 2022

Defendants’ Replies (if any)

May 26, 2022

Proposed hearing date

June 16, 2022, at 2 p.m.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION & ORDER TO CONTINUE OPPOSITION AND REPLY DATES IN CONNECTION WITH DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
3

1
2

Respectfully submitted,
Dated: February 1, 2022

3
4
5
6

By: /s/ Arturo J. González
ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ

7
8

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
BALJIT ATHWAL, DALJIT ATWAL,
WALTER WELLS, AND SCOTT
MCFARLANE

9
10
11

ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ
JESSICA L. GRANT
MATTHEW CHIVVIS
ROBERT S. SANDOVAL
MEREDITH L. ANGUEIRA
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

Dated: February 1, 2022

ALLEN, GLAESSNER,HAZELWOOD &
WERTH, LLP

12
13

By: */s/ Patrick Moriarty
DALE L. ALLEN, JR.
PATRICK D. MORIARTY
JOHN B. ROBINSON

14
15

Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF MODESTO, JON EVERS, and
GALLEN CARROLL

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Dated: February 1, 2022

GWILLIAM, IVARY, CHIOSSO, CAVALLI
&BREWER

By: */s/ Angelina Austin
J. Gary Gwilliam
Randall E. Strauss
Jayme L. Walker
Angelina M. Austin
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ESTATE OF FRANK CARSON, GEORGIA
DEFILIPPO, CHRISTINA DEFILIPPO AND
EDUARDO QUINTANAR, JR.

26
27
28
STIPULATION & ORDER TO CONTINUE OPPOSITION AND REPLY DATES IN CONNECTION WITH DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
4

1

Dated: February 1, 2022

2
3

By: */s/ John Whitefleet
John R. Whitefleet

4
5

Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, STANISLAUS
COUNTY OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT
ATTORNEY, BIRGIT FLADAGER,
MARLISSA FERRIERA, DAVID HARRIS,
KIRK BUNCH, STEVE JACOBSON, CORY
BROWN, DALE LINGERFELT, FROLIAN
MARISCAL, LLOYD MACKINNON, GREG
JONES, KENNETH BARRINGER

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

PORTER SCOTT
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

Dated: February 1, 2022

ARATA SWINGLE VAN EGMOND &
HEITLINGER

By: */s/ Bradley Swingle
Bradley J. Swingle
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF TURLOCK, CITY OF CERES,
FRANK NAVARRO, AND TIMOTHY
REDD
* Parties have consented to use of their electronic signature.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION & ORDER TO CONTINUE OPPOSITION AND REPLY DATES IN CONNECTION WITH DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
5

1
2
3
4
5
6

ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties:
The briefing schedule is as follows:
Plaintiffs’ Oppositions to Defendants’ FRCP
12(b)(6) motions to dismiss

April 11, 2022

Defendants’ Replies (if any)

May 26, 2022

Hearing date

June 16, 2022, at 2 p.m.

7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10
11

Dated: February 1, 2022
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION & ORDER TO CONTINUE OPPOSITION AND REPLY DATES IN CONNECTION WITH DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
6