Athwal et al v. County of Stanislaus et al

Filing 192

STIPULATION and ORDER 191 signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/6/2022 ORDERING the "official capacity" claims against Galen Carroll DISMISSED, and Plaintiffs' reference to the Fourteenth Amendment in the Second Cause of Action STRICKEN. (Krueger, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ (CA SBN 121490) AGonzalez@mofo.com JESSICA L. GRANT (CA SBN 178138) JGrant@mofo.com MATTHEW A. CHIVVIS (CA SBN 251325) MChivvis@mofo.com ROBERT S. SANDOVAL (CA SBN 311032) RSandoval@mofo.com MEREDITH L. ANGUEIRA (CA SBN 333222) MAngueira@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268-7522 Attorneys for Plaintiffs BALJIT ATHWAL and DALJIT ATWAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 BALJIT ATHWAL and DALJIT ATWAL, 14 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF STANISLAUS; CITY OF MODESTO; KIRK BUNCH; JON EVERS; DALE LINGERFELT; STEVE JACOBSON; BIRGIT FLADAGER; and GALEN CARROLL, Case No. 1:15-cv-00311-TLN-BAM Honorable Troy L. Nunley JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AGAINST MODESTO DEFENDANTS Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AGAINST MODESTO DEFENDANTS 1 Defendants CITY OF MODESTO, JON EVERS, AND GALEN CARROLL (“Modesto 2 Defendants”) and Plaintiffs BALJIT ATHWAL, and DALJIT ATWAL (“Plaintiffs”) through 3 their respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 4 5 6 7 8 9 1. WHEREAS the Modesto Defendants served Plaintiffs with a motion to dismiss on January 10, 2022; 2. WHEREAS Plaintiffs’ counsel and the Modesto Defendants’ counsel have conferred in good faith to narrow their disputes; 3. Plaintiffs and the Modesto Defendants stipulate and agree to dismissal of one of the Modesto Defendants, and certain claims (or portions thereof) as follows: 10 4. The “official capacity” claims against Defendant Galen Carroll are dismissed. 11 5. Plaintiffs’ reference to the Fourteenth Amendment in the Second Cause of Action 12 is stricken. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AGAINST MODESTO DEFENDANTS 1 Dated: April 5, 2022 2 3 4 5 ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ JESSICA L. GRANT MATTHEW A. CHIVVIS ROBERT S. SANDOVAL MEREDITH L. ANGUEIRA MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: 6 7 /s/ Arturo J. González ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ Attorneys for Plaintiffs WALTER W. WELLS and SCOTT MCFARLANE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Dated: April 5, 2022 ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP By: */s/ Patrick D. Moriarty PATRICK D. MORIARTY DALE L. ALLEN, JR. JOHN B. ROBINSON Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF MODESTO, GALEN CARROLL, and JON EVERS * Parties have consented to use of their electronic signature. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AGAINST MODESTO DEFENDANTS 1 2 3 ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties: 4 1. The “official capacity” claims against Galen Carroll are dismissed. 5 2. Plaintiffs’ reference to the Fourteenth Amendment in the Second Cause 6 of Action is stricken. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: April 6, 2022 10 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AGAINST MODESTO DEFENDANTS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?