Moore v. SVP Partners, LLC et al

Filing 13

ORDER EXTENDING Time for Defendant Quick 'N' E-Z, Inc., to Respond to the Complaint. Defendant shall have up to and including May 14, 2015, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/27/2015. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 RONALD MOORE, Plaintiff, 10 11 v. Case No. 1:15-cv-00320---SKO ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT QUICK ‘N’ E-Z, INC., TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT 12 SVP PARTNERS, LLC, et al., 13 14 Defendants. _____________________________________/ 15 16 17 The Complaint was filed on March 2, 2015, and served on Defendant Quick ‘N’ E-Z, Inc. 18 (“Defendant”) on March 26, 2015, with an answer due on April 16, 2015. (See Docs. 5, 11.) 19 Plaintiff Ronald Moore and Defendant stipulated to an extension of time for Defendant to respond 20 to the Complaint. (Doc. 11.) This is Defendant’s first request for an extension of time and it does 21 not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order. (Doc. 11.) 22 The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulation and, good cause appearing, Defendant shall 23 have up to and including May 14, 2015, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 27, 2015 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?