Knight v. Matevousian

Filing 36

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 6/29/16: 14-Day Deadline for Respondent to comply with this order. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

WADE KNIGHT,
Petitioner,

12

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

v.

13
14

Case No. 1:15-cv-00340-AWI-EPG-HC

ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN,

15

Respondent.

16
17

Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus

18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On June 10, 2016, this Court ordered that within seven days
19 Respondent was to re-serve Respondent’s response and supplemental declaration (ECF Nos. 32,
20 33) on Petitioner and to file a certificate of service with the Court. (ECF No. 35). Over seven
21 days have passed and Respondent has failed to file a certificate of service with the Court.
22

Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these

23 Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all
24 sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.”
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28 ///

1

1

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent is ordered to show cause why

2 appropriate sanctions should not be imposed for failing to obey a court order within FOURTEEN
3 (14) days of the date of service of this order.
4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 29, 2016

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2