Figueroa, et al. v. City of Fresno
Filing
18
Stipulated PROTECTIVE ORDER. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/20/2015. (Herman, H)
1
5
ARTURO J. GONZALEZ (CA SBN 121490)
AGonzalez@mofo.com
ALEXANDRIA A. AMEZCUA (CA SBN 247507)
AAmezcua@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: 415.268.7000
Facsimile: 415.268.7522
6
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
2
3
4
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
AURORA FIGUEROA, on her own behalf, and
as successor in interest to MARTIN
FIGUEROA, and LIZETTE FIGUEROA, on
her own behalf,
Trial Date: March 20, 2017
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Plaintiffs,
14
v.
15
16
Case No.1:15-cv-00349-MCE-BAM
CITY OF FRESNO, a municipal corporation,
and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
17
Defendants.
18
19
To expedite the flow of discovery materials, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes
20
over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are
21
entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that only materials that the parties and third-parties are
22
entitled to keep confidential are subject to such treatment, and to ensure that the parties are
23
permitted reasonably necessary uses of such materials in preparation for and in the conduct of
24
trial, pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is HEREBY ORDERED
25
THAT:
26
27
28
1
1.
Documents designated as “Confidential” or “Confidential – Counsel Only”
2
(hereinafter collectively “Protected Information”), and produced by parties to this action, are
3
subject to this Protective Order.
4
2.
“Confidential” documents shall be defined as documents for which the designating
5
party would be entitled to have protected from public disclosure by Court order under Rule 26(c)
6
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the relevant case law.
7
3.
“Confidential – Counsel Only” documents shall be defined as “Confidential”
8
documents, as defined in paragraph 2, that also contain sensitive personal information, including,
9
for example, personnel records and medical records.
10
4.
Protected Information shall be used solely in connection with the civil case of
11
Figueroa, et al. v. City of Fresno, et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-00349-MCE-BAM, and in the
12
preparation of trial of this case, or any related proceeding.
13
5.
A party producing the documents and materials described above may designate
14
those materials by affixing a mark labeling them as “Confidential” or “Confidential – Counsel
15
Only.” If any Protected Information cannot be labeled with the aforementioned marking, those
16
materials shall be placed in a sealed envelope or other container that is in turn marked with the
17
appropriate designation in a manner agreed upon by the disclosing and requesting parties.
18
19
6.
Protected Information designated under this Protective Order as ”Confidential”
may only be disclosed to the following persons:
20
a)
Counsel for the parties;
21
b)
Paralegal, clerical, and secretarial personnel regularly employed by counsel
22
referred to in subpart (a) directly above, including stenographic deposition reporters or
23
videographers retained in connection with this action;
24
25
c)
Court personnel including stenographic reporters or videographers engaged
in proceedings as are necessarily incidental to the preparation for the trial of the civil action;
26
d)
Any expert or consultant retained in connection with this action;
27
e)
The finder of fact at the time of trial, subject to the court’s rulings on in
28
limine motions and objections of counsel; and
1
2
f)
litigation or for their counsel to advise them with respect to the litigation.
3
4
The parties, to the extent reasonably necessary to assist their counsel in this
7.
Protected Information designated under this Protective Order as “Confidential –
Counsel Only” may only be disclosed to the following persons:
5
a)
Outside counsel for the parties;
6
b)
Paralegal, clerical, and secretarial personnel regularly employed by counsel
7
referred to in subpart (a) directly above, including stenographic deposition reporters or
8
videographers retained in connection with this action;
9
10
c)
Court personnel including stenographic reporters or videographers engaged
in proceedings as are necessarily incidental to the preparation for the trial of the civil action;
11
d)
Any expert or consultant retained in connection with this action; and
12
e)
The finder of fact at the time of trial, subject to the court’s rulings on in
13
limine motions and objections of counsel.
14
15
8.
All Protected Information filed with the Court for any purpose shall be filed and
served under seal in accordance with Local Rule 141.
16
9.
The designation of information as Protected Information, and the subsequent
17
production thereof, is without prejudice to the right of any party to oppose the admissibility of the
18
designated information.
19
10.
A nonparty producing information or material voluntarily or pursuant to a
20
subpoena or a court order may designate such material or information as Protected Information
21
pursuant to the terms of this Protective Order. The signatories to this Protective Order will treat
22
such information as Protected Information to the same extent as if it had been produced by a
23
party.
24
11.
A party may apply to the Court for an order that information designated as
25
Protected Information pursuant to this Protective Order is not, in fact, “Confidential,” or
26
appropriately designated as “Confidential – Counsel Only.” Prior to so applying, the party
27
seeking to reclassify Protected Information shall meet and confer with the producing party. Until
28
the matter is resolved by the parties or the Court, the Protected Information in question shall
1
continue to be treated according to its designation under the terms of this Protective Order. The
2
producing party shall have the burden of establishing the propriety of the “Confidential” or
3
“Confidential – Counsel Only” designation. A party shall not be obligated to challenge the
4
propriety of a confidentiality designation at the time made, and a failure to do so shall not
5
preclude a subsequent challenge thereto.
6
12.
Each person to whom disclosure is made, with the exception of counsel, and its
7
paralegal, clerical, and secretarial personnel, who are presumed to know the contents of this
8
Protective Order, shall, prior to the time of disclosure, be provided by the person furnishing him
9
or her such material, a copy of this Protective Order. Each person to whom disclosure is made
10
shall agree on the record or in writing that he/she has read the Protective Order and he/she
11
understands the provisions of the Protective Order. Such person must also consent to be subject
12
to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, with respect
13
to any proceeding related to enforcement of this Protective Order, including without limitation,
14
any proceeding for contempt. Provisions of this Protective Order, insofar as they restrict
15
disclosure and use of the material, shall be in effect until further order of this Court.
16
13.
If a receiving party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed
17
Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated
18
Protective Order, the receiving party must immediately (a) notify in writing the designating party
19
of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the
20
Protected Material, and (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were
21
made of all the terms of this Order.
22
14.
When a producing party gives notice to the receiving party or the receiving party
23
otherwise becomes aware that certain inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of
24
privilege or other protection, the receiving party must promptly return or destroy the specified
25
information and any copies it has and may not sequester, use or disclose the information until the
26
claim is resolved. This includes a restriction against presenting the information to the Court for a
27
determination of the claim. This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be
28
established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior privilege review.
1
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and (e), the production of privileged or work-
2
product protected documents or information, including electronically stored information, whether
3
inadvertent or not, is not a waiver of the privilege or protection in connection with discovery in
4
this case or any other federal proceeding.
5
15.
After the conclusion of this litigation, all documents, in whatever form stored or
6
reproduced, containing Protected Information will remain confidential and subject to this
7
Protective Order. The conclusion of this litigation means a termination of the case following
8
applicable post-trial motions, appeal and/or retrial. After the conclusion of this litigation, all
9
Protected Information received under the provisions of this Protective Order, including copies
10
made, shall be destroyed, or tendered back to the attorneys for the party or parties producing the
11
documents. The parties will also take all reasonable and necessary steps to ensure that persons to
12
whom they disclose another party’s Protected Information destroy or return the Protected
13
Information to the producing party.
14
Dated: September 28, 2015
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
15
16
By: /s/ Alexandria A. Amezcua
ALEXANDRIA A. AMEZCUA
17
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
18
19
Dated: September 28, 2015
FERGUSON, PRAET & SHERMAN
20
By: /s/ Bruce D. Praet
Bruce D. Praet
21
22
23
24
25
Attorney for Defendants
///
///
///
26
27
28
///
///
1
The Stipulated Protective order in the above matter is approved.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated:
October 20, 2015
/s/ Barbara
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?