Figueroa, et al. v. City of Fresno

Filing 18

Stipulated PROTECTIVE ORDER. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/20/2015. (Herman, H)

Download PDF
1 5 ARTURO J. GONZALEZ (CA SBN 121490) AGonzalez@mofo.com ALEXANDRIA A. AMEZCUA (CA SBN 247507) AAmezcua@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 2 3 4 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 AURORA FIGUEROA, on her own behalf, and as successor in interest to MARTIN FIGUEROA, and LIZETTE FIGUEROA, on her own behalf, Trial Date: March 20, 2017 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 16 Case No.1:15-cv-00349-MCE-BAM CITY OF FRESNO, a municipal corporation, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 To expedite the flow of discovery materials, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes 20 over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are 21 entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that only materials that the parties and third-parties are 22 entitled to keep confidential are subject to such treatment, and to ensure that the parties are 23 permitted reasonably necessary uses of such materials in preparation for and in the conduct of 24 trial, pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is HEREBY ORDERED 25 THAT: 26 27 28 1 1. Documents designated as “Confidential” or “Confidential – Counsel Only” 2 (hereinafter collectively “Protected Information”), and produced by parties to this action, are 3 subject to this Protective Order. 4 2. “Confidential” documents shall be defined as documents for which the designating 5 party would be entitled to have protected from public disclosure by Court order under Rule 26(c) 6 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the relevant case law. 7 3. “Confidential – Counsel Only” documents shall be defined as “Confidential” 8 documents, as defined in paragraph 2, that also contain sensitive personal information, including, 9 for example, personnel records and medical records. 10 4. Protected Information shall be used solely in connection with the civil case of 11 Figueroa, et al. v. City of Fresno, et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-00349-MCE-BAM, and in the 12 preparation of trial of this case, or any related proceeding. 13 5. A party producing the documents and materials described above may designate 14 those materials by affixing a mark labeling them as “Confidential” or “Confidential – Counsel 15 Only.” If any Protected Information cannot be labeled with the aforementioned marking, those 16 materials shall be placed in a sealed envelope or other container that is in turn marked with the 17 appropriate designation in a manner agreed upon by the disclosing and requesting parties. 18 19 6. Protected Information designated under this Protective Order as ”Confidential” may only be disclosed to the following persons: 20 a) Counsel for the parties; 21 b) Paralegal, clerical, and secretarial personnel regularly employed by counsel 22 referred to in subpart (a) directly above, including stenographic deposition reporters or 23 videographers retained in connection with this action; 24 25 c) Court personnel including stenographic reporters or videographers engaged in proceedings as are necessarily incidental to the preparation for the trial of the civil action; 26 d) Any expert or consultant retained in connection with this action; 27 e) The finder of fact at the time of trial, subject to the court’s rulings on in 28 limine motions and objections of counsel; and 1 2 f) litigation or for their counsel to advise them with respect to the litigation. 3 4 The parties, to the extent reasonably necessary to assist their counsel in this 7. Protected Information designated under this Protective Order as “Confidential – Counsel Only” may only be disclosed to the following persons: 5 a) Outside counsel for the parties; 6 b) Paralegal, clerical, and secretarial personnel regularly employed by counsel 7 referred to in subpart (a) directly above, including stenographic deposition reporters or 8 videographers retained in connection with this action; 9 10 c) Court personnel including stenographic reporters or videographers engaged in proceedings as are necessarily incidental to the preparation for the trial of the civil action; 11 d) Any expert or consultant retained in connection with this action; and 12 e) The finder of fact at the time of trial, subject to the court’s rulings on in 13 limine motions and objections of counsel. 14 15 8. All Protected Information filed with the Court for any purpose shall be filed and served under seal in accordance with Local Rule 141. 16 9. The designation of information as Protected Information, and the subsequent 17 production thereof, is without prejudice to the right of any party to oppose the admissibility of the 18 designated information. 19 10. A nonparty producing information or material voluntarily or pursuant to a 20 subpoena or a court order may designate such material or information as Protected Information 21 pursuant to the terms of this Protective Order. The signatories to this Protective Order will treat 22 such information as Protected Information to the same extent as if it had been produced by a 23 party. 24 11. A party may apply to the Court for an order that information designated as 25 Protected Information pursuant to this Protective Order is not, in fact, “Confidential,” or 26 appropriately designated as “Confidential – Counsel Only.” Prior to so applying, the party 27 seeking to reclassify Protected Information shall meet and confer with the producing party. Until 28 the matter is resolved by the parties or the Court, the Protected Information in question shall 1 continue to be treated according to its designation under the terms of this Protective Order. The 2 producing party shall have the burden of establishing the propriety of the “Confidential” or 3 “Confidential – Counsel Only” designation. A party shall not be obligated to challenge the 4 propriety of a confidentiality designation at the time made, and a failure to do so shall not 5 preclude a subsequent challenge thereto. 6 12. Each person to whom disclosure is made, with the exception of counsel, and its 7 paralegal, clerical, and secretarial personnel, who are presumed to know the contents of this 8 Protective Order, shall, prior to the time of disclosure, be provided by the person furnishing him 9 or her such material, a copy of this Protective Order. Each person to whom disclosure is made 10 shall agree on the record or in writing that he/she has read the Protective Order and he/she 11 understands the provisions of the Protective Order. Such person must also consent to be subject 12 to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, with respect 13 to any proceeding related to enforcement of this Protective Order, including without limitation, 14 any proceeding for contempt. Provisions of this Protective Order, insofar as they restrict 15 disclosure and use of the material, shall be in effect until further order of this Court. 16 13. If a receiving party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed 17 Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated 18 Protective Order, the receiving party must immediately (a) notify in writing the designating party 19 of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the 20 Protected Material, and (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were 21 made of all the terms of this Order. 22 14. When a producing party gives notice to the receiving party or the receiving party 23 otherwise becomes aware that certain inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of 24 privilege or other protection, the receiving party must promptly return or destroy the specified 25 information and any copies it has and may not sequester, use or disclose the information until the 26 claim is resolved. This includes a restriction against presenting the information to the Court for a 27 determination of the claim. This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be 28 established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior privilege review. 1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and (e), the production of privileged or work- 2 product protected documents or information, including electronically stored information, whether 3 inadvertent or not, is not a waiver of the privilege or protection in connection with discovery in 4 this case or any other federal proceeding. 5 15. After the conclusion of this litigation, all documents, in whatever form stored or 6 reproduced, containing Protected Information will remain confidential and subject to this 7 Protective Order. The conclusion of this litigation means a termination of the case following 8 applicable post-trial motions, appeal and/or retrial. After the conclusion of this litigation, all 9 Protected Information received under the provisions of this Protective Order, including copies 10 made, shall be destroyed, or tendered back to the attorneys for the party or parties producing the 11 documents. The parties will also take all reasonable and necessary steps to ensure that persons to 12 whom they disclose another party’s Protected Information destroy or return the Protected 13 Information to the producing party. 14 Dated: September 28, 2015 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 15 16 By: /s/ Alexandria A. Amezcua ALEXANDRIA A. AMEZCUA 17 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18 19 Dated: September 28, 2015 FERGUSON, PRAET & SHERMAN 20 By: /s/ Bruce D. Praet Bruce D. Praet 21 22 23 24 25 Attorney for Defendants /// /// /// 26 27 28 /// /// 1 The Stipulated Protective order in the above matter is approved. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 20, 2015 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?