Figueroa, et al. v. City of Fresno

Filing 8

STIPULATION and ORDER to Reschedule Status Conference: the Telephonic Status Conference regarding assignment to a Sacramento District Judge or Consent is continued from April 2, 2015 to April 30, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. before Judge McAuliffe. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/27/2015. (Herman, H)

Download PDF
1 5 ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ (CA SBN 121490) AGonzalez@mofo.com ALEXANDRIA A. AMEZCUA (CA SBN 247507) AAmezcua@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 11 BRUCE D. PRAET (SBN 119430) BPraet@aol.com G. CRAIG SMITH (SBN 265676) FERGUSON, PRAET & SHERMAN A Professional Corporation 1631 East 18th Street Santa Ana, California 92705 (714) 953-5300 Telephone (714) 953-1143 Facsimile 12 Attorneys for Defendants 2 3 4 8 9 10 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 AURORA FIGUEROA, on her own behalf, and as successor in interest to MARTIN FIGUEROA, and LIZETTE FIGUEROA, on her own behalf, Plaintiffs, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. CITY OF FRESNO, a municipal corporation, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. 1:15-cv-00349 --BAM STIPULATION AND ORDER TO RESCHEDULE STATUS CONFERENCE_ 1 Plaintiff Aurora Figueroa, on her own behalf, and as successor in interest to 2 Martin Figueroa, and Lizette Figueroa, on her own behalf (together, “Plaintiffs”) 3 and Defendant CITY OF FRESNO (“Defendant”), by and through their respective 4 counsel, jointly stipulate as follows: 5 6 7 8 9 10 WHEREAS, on March 4, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a complaint against Defendant (D.E. 1); WHEREAS, on March 9, 2015, Plaintiffs served the complaint on Defendant (D.E. 4); WHEREAS, on March 12, 2015, Defendant filed an answer to the complaint (D.E. 5); 11 WHEREAS, on March 13, 2015, the Courtroom Deputy issued a minute 12 order setting a status conference regarding assignment to a Sacramento District 13 Judge, for April 2, 2015, at 9 a.m. (D.E. 6); 14 WHEREAS, in light of Plaintiffs’ counsel’s previously-scheduled travel 15 obligations to be out of the country the week of March 30, 2015, Plaintiffs have 16 requested, and Defendant has consented, to reschedule the status conference to 17 April 30, at 9 a.m.; and 18 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ counsel spoke with the Courtroom Deputy on 19 March 25, 2015, and confirmed that such time and date is available for the status 20 conference; 21 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties, 22 through their counsel, subject to the Court’s approval, that the status conference 23 shall be rescheduled from April 2, 2015 to April 30, 2015, at 9 a.m. 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order 2 1 Dated: March 26, 2015 2 3 4 ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ ALEXANDRIA A. AMEZCUA MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/Alexandria A. Amezcua Alexandria A. Amezcua 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 6 7 Dated: March 26, 2015 8 9 BRUCE D. PRAET FERGUSON, PRAET & SHERMAN 1631 East 18th Street Santa Ana, California 92705 10 11 By: /s/Bruce D. Praet Bruce D. Praet 12 13 Attorneys for Defendants 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order 3 1 ECF ATTESTATION I, Alexandria A. Amezcua, am the ECF User whose ID and password are 2 3 being used to file the following: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 4 TO RESCHEDULE STATUS CONFERENCE. In compliance with Local Rule 5 5-4.3.4, I hereby attest that Bruce D. Praet has concurred in this filing. 6 Dated: March 26, 2015 7 8 9 ARTURO J. GONZÁLEZ ALEXANDRIA A. AMEZCUA MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/Alexandria A. Amezcua Alexandria A. Amezcua 10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 11 12 ORDER 13 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that the Telephonic 14 15 Status Conference regarding assignment to a Sacramento District Judge or 16 Consent is continued from April 2, 2015 to April 30, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. before 17 Judge McAuliffe. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 27, 2015 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?