Miner, et al. v. Ferranti, et al.
Filing
31
ORDER CLOSING CASE signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/25/2016. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CAROLYN MINER, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
15
v.
BARBARA FERRANTI, et al.,
Defendants.
) Case No.: 1:15-cv-00352 --- JLT
)
) ORDER CLOSING CASE
)
)
)
)
)
)
16
17
On the January 22, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a notice of voluntary dismissal. (Doc. 30) The notice
18
relies upon Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which “the plaintiff may dismiss an
19
action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either
20
an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties
21
who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). Once such a notice has been filed, an order of the
22
Court is not required for the dismissal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111
23
F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997).
24
Here, Defendants, Chase Home Finance, LLC, Christiana Bank & Trust Co., Lasalle Bank,
25
N.A., Washington Mutual Bank, FSB, and Defendants, Fawn Kennedy Dessy, Ronald Dessy, Barbara
26
Ferranti, have filed motions to dismiss. (Docs. 18, 23) However, these motions do not prevent
27
dismissal without further order of the Court. See Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th
28
Cir.1995). [“Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action
1
1
voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1).”] Thus, the Clerk of Court is
2
DIRECTED to close this action in light of the notice of dismissal without prejudice filed and properly
3
signed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 25, 2016
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?