Recino v. Unknown

Filing 19

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this Action be DISMISSED Based on Plaintiff's Failure to Obey a Court Order and Failure to State a Claim re 1 Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/2/2015. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 ROBERTO R. RECINO, 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 UNKNOWN, 13 Defendant. 14 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:15-cv-00362-LJO-BAM (PC) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER AND FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (ECF Nos. 14, 18) FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff Roberto R. Recino (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 5, 2015, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend within 20 thirty days. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Plaintiff was warned that if he failed to file an amended 21 complaint in compliance with the order, this action would be dismissed for failure to obey a 22 court order and failure to state a claim. Plaintiff’s amended complaint was due on or before June 23 8, 2015. (ECF No. 11.) On June 11, 2015, the Court granted Plaintiff a fifteen-day extension of 24 time to file his amended complaint. (ECF No. 18.) The deadline for Plaintiff to file his amended 25 complaint has passed and Plaintiff has not complied with the Court’s order or otherwise 26 contacted the Court. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth any claims upon 27 which relief may be granted. 28 1 1 Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), IT IS HEREBY 2 RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed based on Plaintiff’s failure to obey a court order 3 and failure to state a claim. 4 These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District 5 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 6 fourteen (14) days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may 7 file written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to 8 Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 9 objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of the “right to challenge the 10 magistrate’s factual findings” on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 11 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)). 12 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara July 2, 2015 15 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?