Franks v. Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department

Filing 51

ORDER granting Plaintiff's Motions for Extension of Time to file Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 47 , 48 signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/2/2017. (Opposition Filing Deadline: 10/5/2017). (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

TOM MARK FRANKS,

Case No. 1:15-cv-00401-EPG-PC

11
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff,

12
v.

13
14

SERGEANT KIRK, et al.

15

Defendants.

(ECF Nos. 47, 48)

16
17
Plaintiff Tom Mark Franks is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action
18
19
20
21
22

alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 31, 2017, Defendants filed a motion for
summary judgment. (ECF No. 46.) On September 21, 2017 and September 25, 2017, Plaintiff
filed motions for extension of time to file opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary
judgment. (ECF Nos. 47, 48.) Plaintiff states that he did not receive Defendants’ motion until

23

September 13, 2017, because it was improperly mailed and improperly processed. On

24

September 27, 2017, Defendants filed a statement of non-opposition to Plaintiff’s motions for

25

an extension of time. (ECF No. 49.)

26

\\\

27

\\\

28

\\\

1

1

Accordingly, good cause appearing, Plaintiff’s motions are granted. Plaintiff is granted

2

an extension of time until October 5, 2017 in which to file his opposition to Defendants’

3

motion for summary judgment.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
Dated:

October 2, 2017

/s/

7

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2