King v. Biter et al
Filing
35
ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to TERMINATE Defendant Tallerico Pursuant to Order Dated January 30, 2017, and DIRECTING Defendants Tarnoff, Acebedo, Castro, Lawless, and Biter to File a Response to Complaint within Twenty Days From the Date of Service of this Order signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/15/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LARRY DONNELL KING, SR.,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
M.D. BITER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:15-cv-00414-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
TERMINATE DEFENDANT TALLERICO
PURSUANT TO ORDER DATED JANUARY 30,
2017, AND DIRECTING DEFENDANTS
TARNOFF, ACEBEDO, CASTRO, LAWLESS
AND BITER TO FILE A RESPONSE TO
COMPLAINT WITHIN TWENTY DAYS FROM
THE DATE OF SERVICE OF THIS ORDER
[ECF Nos. 33 & 34]
Plaintiff Larry Donnell King, Sr. is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
20
On January 30, 2017, Defendants’ motion to dismiss was granted in part and denied in part,
21
and Plaintiff was granted thirty days to file an amended complaint as to Defendant Tallerico. (ECF
22
No. 33.)
23
On February 13, 2017, Plaintiff filed a notice of his intent not to file an amended complaint
24
and to proceed on the claims against Defendants Tarnoff, Acebedo, Castro, Lawless and Biter. (ECF
25
No. 34.)
26
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
1.
28
The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Defendant Tallerico pursuant to the Court’s
January 30, 2017, order; and
1
2.
1
2
Within twenty (20) days from the date of service of this order, Defendants Tarnoff,
Acebedo, Castro, Lawless and Biter shall file a response to the first amended complaint.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated:
6
February 15, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?