Dearwester v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 15

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why Action Should not be Dismissed for Failure to follow Court Order and Failure to Prosecute signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 05/18/2015. Show Cause Response due by 6/22/2015.(Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

FRANK LEE DEARWESTER,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.

Case No. 1:15-cv-00415-DLB PC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
FOR FAILURE TO FOLLOW COURT
ORDER AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

CDCR, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff Frank Lee Dearwester (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in

18

this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on February 26, 2015, and it

19

was transferred to this Court on March 16, 2015.
On March 20, 2015, the Court struck Plaintiff’s complaint as unsigned an ordered him to file

20
21

a signed complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of service. Over thirty (30) days have passed

22

and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.
Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERD TO SHOW CAUSE, if any he has, why this action should

23
24

not be dismissed for failure to follow a Court order and failure to prosecute. Plaintiff shall file a

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

response to this order within thirty (30) days of the date of service. Plaintiff may also comply with

2

this order by filing a signed amended complaint pursuant to the March 20, 2015, order.

3

Failure to file a response will result in dismissal of this action.

4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Dennis

May 18, 2015

L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2