Aldapa et al v. Fowler Packing Company Inc. et al
Filing
144
ORDER Granting Relief From Page Limitations and Extending Deadline for Filing Reply Brief (Doc. #143 ), signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/30/2017. (Gaumnitz, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BEATRIZ ALDAPA, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
16
17
v.
FOWLER PACKING COMPANY, INC.,
et al.,
No. 1:15-cv-00420-DAD-SAB
ORDER GRANTING RELIEF FROM PAGE
LIMITATIONS AND EXTENDING
DEADLINE FOR FILING REPLY BRIEF
(Doc. No. 143)
Defendants.
On January 26, 2017, the parties to this action filed a stipulation seeking relief from the
18
applicable page limitations with respect to briefing related to the motion for class certification in
19
this matter. (Doc. No. 143.) Specifically, the parties have requested the page limit for the
20
opening brief and opposition brief be expanded to sixty-five (65) pages, and the page limit for the
21
reply brief be expanded to twenty-five (25) pages. The parties have also requested that plaintiffs
22
be granted an extension of time of seven (7) days to file their reply brief on or before March 20,
23
2017. These extensions are necessary because of the size of this motion, plaintiffs having alleged
24
twelve separate causes of action and seeking certification of twelve distinct subclasses, all of
25
which would contain hundreds or thousands of workers. (Doc. No. 143 at 2.)
26
Good cause having been shown,
27
1. The opening brief for plaintiffs’ motion for class certification shall be no more than
28
sixty-five (65) pages in length;
1
1
2
2. The opposition brief in connection with the motion shall be no more than sixty-five
(65) pages in length;
3
3. The reply brief shall be no more than twenty-five (25) pages in length; and
4
4. Plaintiffs shall file their reply brief by March 20, 2017.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 30, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?