United States of America et al v. Somina, Inc., et al.
Filing
227
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on December 20, 2022, as follows: 1. By no later than January 11, 2023, the United States of America, the State of California, Nicolle O'Neill, Somnia, Inc., Primary Anesthesia Services, Byro n Mendenhall, M.D., and Quinn Gee, M.D. shall file a joint status report addressing the following: a. The status of settlement negotiations as to all claims between them, including whether they have executed a final settlement agreement; b. The da te that the parties anticipate filing an appropriate dispositional document(s); c. Whether the Court should vacate the January 30, 2023, pretrial conference and March 28, 2023, trial; and d. Any other matters that the parties believe warrants the Court's attention. (Rooney, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
UNITED STATES and the STATE OF
CALIFORNIA ex rel. NICOLLE
O’NEILL,
13
14
15
16
Plaintiffs/Relator,
Case No. 1:15-cv-433-ADA-EPG
ORDER REQUIRING JOINT STATUS
REPORT
v.
(ECF Nos. 212, 226)
SOMNIA, INC. et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
This matter is before the Court on the notice of settlements filed by certain parties to this
19
action. (ECF Nos. 212, 226). On July 29, 2022, the United States of America, the State of
20
California, and Nicolle O’Neill (Plaintiffs/Relator), and Defendants Somnia, Inc., Primary
21
Anesthesia Services, Byron Mendenhall, M.D., and Quinn Gee, M.D. (Somnia Defendants)
22
23
24
25
advised the Court that they had reached an agreement to settle the claims filed against Somnia
Defendants under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b), and the
California False Claims Act, Cal. Gov’t Code § 12652(c). However, the parties identified the
following claims as still at issue: (1) Relator’s attorneys’ fees and costs arising from the
prosecution of claims filed against Somnia Defendants under the qui tam provisions of the False
26
27
Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b), and the California False Claims Act, Cal. Gov’t Code
§ 12652(c); (2) Plaintiff Nicolle O’Neill’s individual claims for relief against Somnia Defendants;
28
1
1
2
and (3) Relator’s claims against Defendant PST Services LLC.
On December 16, 2022, Plaintiff/Relator Nicolle O’Neill notified the Court that she and
3
the Somnia Defendants had reached an agreement in principle to resolve all of the remaining
4
claims between them and are in the process of negotiating and executing a formal written
5
settlement agreement and related document. However, Plaintiff/Relator Nicolle O’Neill states that
6
7
8
9
Defendant PST Services, LLC is not a party to the agreement, and Plaintiff/Relator’s motion for
reconsideration of the decision dismissing her claims against PST Services, LLC (ECF No. 207)
remains pending.
In light of the notices of settlement, it appears that all claims against the Somnia
Defendants have been resolved, at least in principle. Thus, the Court finds it appropriate to order
10
the parties to file a joint status report regarding the disposition of all claims against these
11
12
13
Defendants.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. By no later than January 11, 2023, the United States of America, the State of California,
14
Nicolle O’Neill, Somnia, Inc., Primary Anesthesia Services, Byron Mendenhall, M.D.,
15
and Quinn Gee, M.D. shall file a joint status report addressing the following:
16
a. The status of settlement negotiations as to all claims between them, including
17
whether they have executed a final settlement agreement;
18
b. The date that the parties anticipate filing an appropriate dispositional document(s);
19
c. Whether the Court should vacate the January 30, 2023 pretrial conference and
March 28, 2023 trial; and
20
d. Any other matters that the parties believe warrants the Court’s attention.
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
Dated:
December 20, 2022
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?