Chargualaf v. Zuniga

Filing 15

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions should not be Imposed; Show Cause Response due within Fourteen Days signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/6/2015. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HONOFRE JAMES O CHARGUALAF, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 15 Case No. 1:15-cv-00462-LJO-SAB-HC ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED v. RAFAEL ZUNIGA Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 19 On June 9, 2015, this Court ordered Petitioner to show cause why the petition should not 20 be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 within thirty days of the date of 21 service of the order. (ECF No. 8 at 6). The Court ordered Respondent to file a reply to 22 Petitioner’s Response to the Order to Show Cause within thirty (30) days of the date Petitioner’s 23 brief was filed with the Court. (ECF No. 8 at 6). Petitioner filed his brief with the Court on July 24 1, 2015. (ECF No. 14). Over thirty (30) days have passed and Respondent has failed to file his 25 Reply to Petitioner’s Response to the Order to Show Cause. 26 Local Rule 110 provides that “a failure of counsel or of a party to comply with these 27 Local Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for the imposition by the Court of 28 any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” 1 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent is ordered to show cause why 1 2 appropriate sanctions should not be imposed for failing to obey a court order within FOURTEEN 3 (14) days of the date of service of this order. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: August 6, 2015 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?