Moore v. Zamzami et al

Filing 18

ORDER Granting Dismissal Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1); ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Close Case and Adjust Docket to Reflect Voluntary Dismissal re 16 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/24/15. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RONALD MOORE, Plaintiff, 12 ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1) v. 13 14 Case No. 1:15-cv-00480-SAB NAGI MOHSEN ZAMZAMI, et al., 15 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Defendants. (ECF No. 16) 16 17 18 On July 22, 2015, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure due to reaching a settlement in this action. 20 “[U]nder Rule 41(a)(1)(i), „a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his 21 action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.‟” 22 Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) 23 (quoting Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997)). “[A] dismissal under 24 Rule 41(a)(1) is effective on filing, no court order is required, the parties are left as though no 25 action had been brought, the defendant can‟t complain, and the district court lacks jurisdiction to 26 do anything about it.” Id. at 1078. In this action no defendant has filed an answer or other 27 responsive pleading. 28 / / / 1 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 1 2 case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: July 24, 2015 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?