Burgess v. Mineni

Filing 11

ORDER RESETTING the Hearing on the United States' Motion for Summary Judgment to 7/29/2015, at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Any opposition by any party to the Motion for Summary Judgment shall be filed by no later than 6/17/2015, and any reply brief by the United States shall be filed by no later than 7/1/2015. The Scheduling Conference currently set for 7/2/2015, is VACATED and will be reset as appropriate upon consideration of the United States' Motion for Summary Judgment. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/28/2015. (Timken, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
JOHN BURGESS,

11

Case No. 1:15-cv-00487---SKO

Plaintiff,

12

ORDER RESETTING THE HEARING ON
THE UNITED STATES' MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO JULY 29,
2015

v.

13
14

DENNIS MINENI,

15

Defendant,

16
17

DENNIS MINENI,

18
Counter Claimant,
19
v.

20

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

21

Counter Defendant,

22
23

_____________________________________/

24
On April 28, 2015, Plaintiff John Burgess ("Burgess") and Defendant Dennis Mineni

25

1
26 ("Mineni"), who are both proceeding pro se, and with Patrick Jennings, Esq., on behalf of the

27
28

1

On April 27, 2015, Burgess filed a document entitled "Judicial Notice and Objections" wherein he stated that any
appearance he makes in this Court will be "In propria persona" and not "pro se." (Doc. 9.) The Court notes that "in
propria persona is Latin for "in his own person" (Black's Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009)), and it is sometimes

1 United States of America ("United States"), appeared telephonically for a case management
2 conference. During the conference, all parties stated their desire to consent to the jurisdiction of a
3 U.S. Magistrate Judge for all purposes in this matter, including trial. As Burgess and Mineni are
4 proceeding pro se, they are to coordinate with Courtroom Deputy Alice Timken at [phone]
5 regarding submission and filing of their respective consent forms.
6

To allow sufficient time for the consent forms to be mailed to the Court and filed, the

7 United States' Motion for Summary Judgment, currently set for May 20, 2015, is CONTINUED to
8 July 29, 2015, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7, and the briefing on the motion is set as follows:
9

1.

Any opposition by any party to the Motion for Summary Judgment shall be filed by
no later than June 17, 2015;2 and

10
11

2.

12

All deadlines stated herein are for purposes of filing. To the extent the parties are mailing

Any reply brief by the United States shall be filed by no later than July 1, 2015.

13 their briefs and documents to the Court to be filed, sufficient time must be permitted prior to the
14 deadline so that any document mailed can be received and filed on or before the filing deadline.
15

The Scheduling Conference currently set for July 2, 2015, is VACATED and will be reset

16 as appropriate upon consideration of the United States' Motion for Summary Judgment.
17
18

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

19

April 28, 2015

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26 shortened to "pro se" or "pro per." The Court makes no distinction among these terms, as all indicate a party who
proceeding without representation of counsel.

27
28

2

All deadlines stated herein are for purposes of filing. To the extent the parties are mailing their briefs and documents
to the Court to be filed, sufficient time must be permitted prior to the deadline so that any document mailed can be
received and filed on or before the filing deadline.

2