Torres v. County of Fresno, et al

Filing 31

STIPULATION and ORDER to Modify Status (Pre-Trial Scheduling Order (Doc. Nos. 17 & 25): the parties, through their respective counsel, stipulate to modify the Status (Pre-Trial Scheduling) Order (Doc. Nos. 17 & 25) to extend the deadline for Defendan t to designate rebuttal expert(s) from the current date of October 21, 2016 to three weeks from the date Defendant receives plaintiffs expert report or no later than November 21, 2016. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/26/2016. (Herman, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Lazaro Salazar, Esq. SBN# 234183 Lazaro Salazar Law, Inc. 252 N. Fulton Street Fresno, California 93701 (559) 498-0828 lazaro@lazarosalazarlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff, Pablo Mendoza Torres 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-FRESNO DIVISION 8 9 PABLO MENDOZA TORRES, Plaintiff, 10 11 vs. 12 COUNTY OF FRESNO; FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, DOES 1-25 13 14 Case No.: 1:15-CV-00489-DAD-BAM STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY STATUS (PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER (DOC. NOS. 17 & 25) Defendant Defendant County of Fresno (sued as County of Fresno and Fresno Sheriff’s Department) 15 16 (“Defendant”) timely served its expert disclosures on October 7, 2016 pursuant to Rule 26(a)(2) 17 and the Stipulation and Order to Modify Status (Pre-trial Scheduling) Order (Doc. Nos. 17 & 19). 18 See Doc. No. 25. 19 Plaintiff Pablo Mendoza-Torres (“Plaintiff”) timely served a document identifying three experts 1 on Defendant without including any expert reports due to 20 miscommunication between plaintiff’s counsel and his expert. Plaintiff anticipates receiving the 21 22 expert report on or about October 28, 2016, at which time Plaintiff will serve Defendant with 23 Plaintiff’s expert’s report. After meeting and conferring, the parties, through their respective 24 counsel, stipulate to modify the Status (Pre-Trial Scheduling) Order (Doc. Nos. 17 & 25) to 25 extend the deadline for Defendant to designate rebuttal expert(s) from the current date of October 26 27 28 1 Plaintiff has since withdrawn at least one of the experts and has expressed his intention of withdrawing one of the other two remaining experts. 1 2 21, 2016 to three weeks from the date Defendant receives plaintiff’s expert report or no later than November 21, 2016. 3 4 IT IS SO STIPULATED. LAZARO SALAZAR LAW, INC. 5 6 Dated: October 24, 2016 7 /s/Lazaro Salazar__ _____________ Lazaro Salazar Attorney for Plaintiff, Pablo Mendoza Torrez 8 WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP 9 10 Dated: October 24, 2016 11 12 /s/ Brande L. Gustafson___________________ James D. Weakley Brande L. Gustafson Attorney for Defendants County of Fresno & Fresno County Sheriff’s Department 13 14 ORDER 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 Dated: October 26, 2016 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?