Torres v. County of Fresno, et al
Filing
31
STIPULATION and ORDER to Modify Status (Pre-Trial Scheduling Order (Doc. Nos. 17 & 25): the parties, through their respective counsel, stipulate to modify the Status (Pre-Trial Scheduling) Order (Doc. Nos. 17 & 25) to extend the deadline for Defendan t to designate rebuttal expert(s) from the current date of October 21, 2016 to three weeks from the date Defendant receives plaintiffs expert report or no later than November 21, 2016. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/26/2016. (Herman, H)
1
2
3
4
5
Lazaro Salazar, Esq. SBN# 234183
Lazaro Salazar Law, Inc.
252 N. Fulton Street
Fresno, California 93701
(559) 498-0828
lazaro@lazarosalazarlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff, Pablo Mendoza Torres
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-FRESNO DIVISION
8
9
PABLO MENDOZA TORRES,
Plaintiff,
10
11
vs.
12
COUNTY OF FRESNO; FRESNO COUNTY
SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, DOES 1-25
13
14
Case No.: 1:15-CV-00489-DAD-BAM
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY
STATUS (PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING)
ORDER (DOC. NOS. 17 & 25)
Defendant
Defendant County of Fresno (sued as County of Fresno and Fresno Sheriff’s Department)
15
16
(“Defendant”) timely served its expert disclosures on October 7, 2016 pursuant to Rule 26(a)(2)
17
and the Stipulation and Order to Modify Status (Pre-trial Scheduling) Order (Doc. Nos. 17 & 19).
18
See Doc. No. 25.
19
Plaintiff Pablo Mendoza-Torres (“Plaintiff”) timely served a document
identifying three experts
1
on Defendant without including any expert reports due to
20
miscommunication between plaintiff’s counsel and his expert. Plaintiff anticipates receiving the
21
22
expert report on or about October 28, 2016, at which time Plaintiff will serve Defendant with
23
Plaintiff’s expert’s report. After meeting and conferring, the parties, through their respective
24
counsel, stipulate to modify the Status (Pre-Trial Scheduling) Order (Doc. Nos. 17 & 25) to
25
extend the deadline for Defendant to designate rebuttal expert(s) from the current date of October
26
27
28
1
Plaintiff has since withdrawn at least one of the experts and has expressed his intention of withdrawing
one of the other two remaining experts.
1
2
21, 2016 to three weeks from the date Defendant receives plaintiff’s expert report or no later than
November 21, 2016.
3
4
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
LAZARO SALAZAR LAW, INC.
5
6
Dated: October 24, 2016
7
/s/Lazaro Salazar__
_____________
Lazaro Salazar
Attorney for Plaintiff, Pablo Mendoza Torrez
8
WEAKLEY & ARENDT, LLP
9
10
Dated: October 24, 2016
11
12
/s/ Brande L. Gustafson___________________
James D. Weakley
Brande L. Gustafson
Attorney for Defendants County of Fresno &
Fresno County Sheriff’s Department
13
14
ORDER
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
Dated: October 26, 2016
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
/s/ Barbara
A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?