Raymond R. Robison v. Valenzuela

Filing 22

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION that the Court Dismiss the Case for Failure to Prosecute 1 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/13/2018: 30-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAYMOND R. ROBISON, 12 13 14 15 No. 1:15-cv-00520-LJO-SKO Petitioner, v. E. VALENZUELA, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION THAT THE COURT DISMISS THE CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, Raymond R. Robison, is a state prisoner proceeding with a petition for writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On December 19, 2017, a copy of the Court’s 19 “Findings and Recommendation that the Court Deny Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” mailed 20 to Petitioner was returned to the Clerk marked "Undeliverable, Paroled/Discharged." 21 22 23 24 25 26 Local Rule 183 provides: A party appearing in propria persona shall keep the Court and opposing parties advised as to his or her current address. If mail directed to a plaintiff in propria persona by the Clerk is returned by the U.S. Postal Service, and if such Plaintiff fails to notify the Court and opposing parties within sixty-three (63) days thereafter of a current address, the Court may dismiss the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Although more than sixty-three (63) days have elapsed from the date of the return of the 27 28 Findings and Recommendation, Petitioner has failed to advise the Court of his current address or 1 1 contact the Court in any other way. The Court has the discretion to impose any and all sanctions 2 authorized by statute or rule or within the inherent power of the Court, including dismissing the 3 motion, based on a petitioner’s failure to comply with a court rule. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11; Local R. 4 110. 5 Conclusion and Recommendation 6 Accordingly, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that as a result of Petitioner’s failure to 7 8 prosecute the case, the Court dismiss with prejudice the motion for reconsideration in the above- 9 captioned action. 10 11 These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C ' 636(b)(1). Within thirty 12 13 14 (30) days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Petitioner may file written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned AObjections to Magistrate 15 Judge=s Findings and Recommendations.@ Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections 16 within the specified time may constitute waiver of the right to appeal the District Court's order. 17 Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 18 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)). 19 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 13, 2018 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?